1998/1 - Lesquende v Planning and Environment [1998] UR 1 (5 January 1998)
The Court of Appeal held that the Royal Court has jurisdiction to entertain judicial review of an arbitration award made under the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961, as Article 12 does not expressly or by necessary implication exclude judicial review. However, the existence of an effective alternative statutory remedy (case stated procedure) means judicial review should ordinarily be refused unless exceptional circumstances exist. In this case, as the parties engaged the judicial review procedure and the Royal Court exercised jurisdiction, the Court of Appeal would not interfere.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 1
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Lesquende Limited; Defendant/appellant: The Planning and Environment Committee of the States of Jersey
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 January 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Jurisdiction affirmed; appeal on preliminary issue dismissed; substantive appeal to proceed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Compulsory Purchase, Arbitration Awards, Jurisdiction of Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lesquende Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
The Planning and Environment Committee of the States of Jersey
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Royal Court have jurisdiction to set aside an arbitration award made by the Board of Arbitrators under the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961?
- 2 Is judicial review available as a remedy in Jersey in the context of statutory arbitration awards?
- 3 Does the existence of a statutory case stated procedure exclude or limit judicial review?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the Royal Court has jurisdiction to entertain judicial review of an arbitration award made under the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961, as Article 12 does not expressly or by necessary implication exclude judicial review. However, the existence of an effective alternative statutory remedy (case stated procedure) means judicial review should ordinarily be refused unless exceptional circumstances exist. In this case, as the parties engaged the judicial review procedure and the Royal Court exercised jurisdiction, the Court of Appeal would not interfere.
Court Disposition
Jurisdiction affirmed; appeal on preliminary issue dismissed; substantive appeal to proceed.
Orders
- The Court of Appeal affirms the jurisdiction of the Royal Court to entertain judicial review.
- The substantive issues in the appeal are to proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment