I -v- J [2017] JCA 045B (17 March 2017)

I -v- J [2017] JCA 045B (17 March 2017)

The application did not identify any arguable point of law, let alone one of general public importance, and therefore did not meet the standard for granting leave to appeal to the Privy Council.

Citation
[2017] JCA 045B
Parties
Respondent/plaintiff: I; Appellant/defendant: J
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
17 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal to Privy Council
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Privy Council, Arguable Point of Law, General Public Importance
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Privy Council Arguable Point of Law General Public Importance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

I

Respondent/plaintiff

J

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal to Privy Council

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application raises an arguable point of law of general public importance suitable for consideration by the Privy Council

Ratio Decidendi

The application did not identify any arguable point of law, let alone one of general public importance, and therefore did not meet the standard for granting leave to appeal to the Privy Council.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal to the Privy Council is refused