1998/12a - Mayo Associates and Ors v Anagram (Bermuda) Ltd an [1998] UR 12a (12 January 1998)
Although the Bailiff was not satisfied that his comments could objectively be construed as giving the appearance of bias, he exercised his discretion to recuse himself to maintain confidence in the administration of justice.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 12
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Mr Sinel's clients; Presiding Judge: The Bailiff
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Challenge to Judicial Impartiality in Ongoing Tort Litigation / Interlocutory Application for Recusal
- Outcome
- Application for recusal allowed; Bailiff disqualified himself from presiding over the hearing of the summonses.
- Legal Topics
- Recusal of Judge, Apparent Bias, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Sinel's clients
Plaintiffs
The Bailiff
Presiding Judge
Procedural Posture
Challenge to Judicial Impartiality in Ongoing Tort Litigation / Interlocutory Application for Recusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bailiff's prior public comments create an appearance of bias requiring recusal from hearing summonses in ongoing litigation
Ratio Decidendi
Although the Bailiff was not satisfied that his comments could objectively be construed as giving the appearance of bias, he exercised his discretion to recuse himself to maintain confidence in the administration of justice.
Court Disposition
Application for recusal allowed; Bailiff disqualified himself from presiding over the hearing of the summonses.
Orders
- Bailiff recused from hearing the summonses.
- Costs will be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment