Representation of Powell [2018] JCA 099 (01 June 2018)
The Royal Court's decision was interlocutory as it did not finally determine the substantive rights between Mrs Powell and her creditors but merely confirmed the procedural consequence of the Remise's failure; thus, leave to appeal is required.
- Citation
- [2018] JCA 099
- Parties
- Representor/appellant: Caroline Elizabeth Powell nee Chambers
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy/remise De Biens Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal required; no automatic right of appeal; directions given for written submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Remise De Biens, Interlocutory Vs Final Decisions, Appeal Procedure, Extension of Remise, Cession Générale
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caroline Elizabeth Powell nee Chambers
Representor/appellant
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy/remise De Biens Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Royal Court's decision of 20 April 2018 was interlocutory or final
- 2 Whether Mrs Powell is entitled to appeal as of right or requires leave
- 3 Whether an extension of the Remise de Biens can be granted after expiry and without creditor consent
Ratio Decidendi
The Royal Court's decision was interlocutory as it did not finally determine the substantive rights between Mrs Powell and her creditors but merely confirmed the procedural consequence of the Remise's failure; thus, leave to appeal is required.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal required; no automatic right of appeal; directions given for written submissions.
Orders
- Mrs Powell to lodge written submissions by noon on 12 June 2018.
- Creditors to respond by noon on 15 June 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment