Colesberg Hotel v Alton Hotel [2003] JCA 083 (16 May 2003)
Even assuming the restrictive interpretation of 'à tous usages', the use of the right of way for access to residential flats and associated parking on the garden site was within the contemplation of the parties to the 1871 deed and does not constitute an aggravation of the servitude. Allocation of parking spaces to residents who are occupiers of the dominant tenement is a permitted use. The proposed use does not inevitably render the burden on the servient tenement more onerous or inconvenient.
- Citation
- [2003] JCA 083
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: The Colesberg Hotel (1972) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Alton Hotel Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 6 February 2003
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Royal Court upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Servitudes, Right of Way, Interpretation of Deeds, Aggravation of Servitude, Jersey Land Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Colesberg Hotel (1972) Limited
Plaintiff/appellant
Alton Hotel Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 6 February 2003
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed use of a right of way by the Defendant constitutes an aggravation of the servitude under Jersey law
- 2 Interpretation of the phrase 'à tous usages' in the 1871 deed granting the right of way
- 3 Whether allocation of parking spaces to residents of flats on a different tenement constitutes an impermissible use of the servitude
Ratio Decidendi
Even assuming the restrictive interpretation of 'à tous usages', the use of the right of way for access to residential flats and associated parking on the garden site was within the contemplation of the parties to the 1871 deed and does not constitute an aggravation of the servitude. Allocation of parking spaces to residents who are occupiers of the dominant tenement is a permitted use. The proposed use does not inevitably render the burden on the servient tenement more onerous or inconvenient.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Royal Court upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment