In the matter of the L Trust [2017] JRC 191 (10 November 2017)
The 2013 instrument was set aside because the trustee acted on incorrect tax advice, failing to consider relevant tax consequences, and would not have executed the instrument but for that mistake. The mistake was sufficiently serious to justify relief. The 2003 deed's life interest appointment was valid and did not require protector consent, as the protector provisions were only created after the life interest was irrevocably granted.
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 191
- Parties
- Original Trustee: Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Limited; Subsequent Trustee: Vivat Trustees Limited; Current Trustee: Representor; Settlor/beneficiary: Mr C; Beneficiary: Mrs C; Beneficiary: D; Beneficiary: E; Beneficiary: F; Beneficiary: Unborn issue of the settlor
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Law Application / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Instrument and for Declaration
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Trustee Decisions, Mistake in Trust Administration, Inheritance Tax Liability, Protector Consent in Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Limited
Original Trustee
Vivat Trustees Limited
Subsequent Trustee
Representor
Current Trustee
Mr C
Settlor/beneficiary
Mrs C
Beneficiary
D
Beneficiary
E
Beneficiary
F
Beneficiary
Unborn issue of the settlor
Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Trust Law Application / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Instrument and for Declaration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2013 instrument appointing a joint life interest should be set aside under Articles 47G and 47H of the Trusts (Jersey) Law due to mistake and failure to consider relevant tax consequences
- 2 Whether the 2003 deed's appointment of a life interest in favour of the settlor was valid without protector consent
Ratio Decidendi
The 2013 instrument was set aside because the trustee acted on incorrect tax advice, failing to consider relevant tax consequences, and would not have executed the instrument but for that mistake. The mistake was sufficiently serious to justify relief. The 2003 deed's life interest appointment was valid and did not require protector consent, as the protector provisions were only created after the life interest was irrevocably granted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The 2013 instrument appointing a joint life interest is declared void and of no effect from the date of the instrument under Articles 47G and 47H of the Trusts (Jersey) Law.
- Declaration that the creation of the life interest in favour of the settlor under the 2003 deed did not require protector consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment