Highfield v Minister for Health and Social Services [2011] JCA 023 (25 January 2011)
Article 50(2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969 applies to proceedings against the Minister for acts or omissions in the exercise of statutory control over patients. The procedural requirement to obtain leave from the Superior Number of the Royal Court before bringing such proceedings is mandatory and applies to both direct and vicarious liability. Failure to obtain leave renders the proceedings a nullity, and the court has no jurisdiction to entertain them.
- Citation
- [2011] JCA 023
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: John Michael Highfield; Defendant/respondent: Minister for Health and Social Services
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 3 August 2010
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; proceedings declared a nullity.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Vicarious Liability, Negligence, Procedural Bars to Litigation, Access to Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Michael Highfield
Plaintiff/appellant
Minister for Health and Social Services
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Dated 3 August 2010
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Article 50(2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969 bar proceedings against the Minister for Health and Social Services for alleged negligence by staff in failing to prevent a detained patient's injury?
- 2 Does Article 50(2) apply to proceedings against the Minister or only to health professionals?
- 3 What is the scope of 'acts purporting to be done in pursuance of this Law' under Article 50?
Ratio Decidendi
Article 50(2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969 applies to proceedings against the Minister for acts or omissions in the exercise of statutory control over patients. The procedural requirement to obtain leave from the Superior Number of the Royal Court before bringing such proceedings is mandatory and applies to both direct and vicarious liability. Failure to obtain leave renders the proceedings a nullity, and the court has no jurisdiction to entertain them.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; proceedings declared a nullity.
Orders
- Proceedings dismissed as a nullity for failure to obtain leave under Article 50(2) of the Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment