Representation of BOS Trustee Limited [2023] JRC 242 (30 November 2023)
The Court declined to accept the Trustee's surrender of discretion as there was no good reason; making difficult decisions is part of a trustee's role, and the Trustee was not disabled by conflict or uncertainty regarding the First Respondent's beneficiary status. The Trustee was directed to make a decision within twenty-one days and disclose reasons to all Respondents. The Trustee was entitled to indemnity for its costs as its application, though rejected, was not pursued unreasonably.
- Citation
- [2023] JRC 242
- Parties
- Representor/trustee: BOS Trustee Limited; Beneficiary/settlor's Second Wife: First Respondent; Settlor's Second Daughter by First Marriage: Second Respondent; Grandchild of Settlor by Deceased Son: Third Respondent; Grandchild of Settlor by Deceased Son: Fourth Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Representation (trustee Application) / Post Hearing Judgment on Costs and Directions
- Outcome
- Relief sought by Trustee (surrender of discretion) refused; Trustee directed to make decision within twenty-one days; Trustee entitled to indemnity for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Surrender of Trustee Discretion, Trustee Costs, Beneficiary Status, Directions to Trustees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BOS Trustee Limited
Representor/trustee
First Respondent
Beneficiary/settlor's Second Wife
Second Respondent
Settlor's Second Daughter by First Marriage
Third Respondent
Grandchild of Settlor by Deceased Son
Fourth Respondent
Grandchild of Settlor by Deceased Son
Procedural Posture
Representation (trustee Application) / Post Hearing Judgment on Costs and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the Court accept the Trustee's surrender of discretion?
- 2 Should the Trustee make a distribution to the First Respondent?
- 3 What directions should be given to the Trustee?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to accept the Trustee's surrender of discretion as there was no good reason; making difficult decisions is part of a trustee's role, and the Trustee was not disabled by conflict or uncertainty regarding the First Respondent's beneficiary status. The Trustee was directed to make a decision within twenty-one days and disclose reasons to all Respondents. The Trustee was entitled to indemnity for its costs as its application, though rejected, was not pursued unreasonably.
Court Disposition
Relief sought by Trustee (surrender of discretion) refused; Trustee directed to make decision within twenty-one days; Trustee entitled to indemnity for costs.
Orders
- Trustee to make decision on distribution request within twenty-one days and inform Respondents with reasons.
- Trustee's costs of and incidental to the Representation to be met from the assets of the Trust on the usual indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment