A Settlement [2009] JRC 223 (25 November 2009)
The Court accepted the surrender of RBC's discretion as trustee due to genuine conflicts of interest arising from disputes among beneficiaries and allegations of improper benefit by D directors. The Court adjourned the application for three months to allow for without prejudice discussions or mediation, discharged the embargo on distributions from the D Settlement, and deferred decisions on disclosure orders, trustee fees, and payment of directors' fees pending further submissions and resolution efforts.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 223
- Parties
- Representor/trustee: RBC; Beneficiaries/respondents: First Respondents (D family, including H, G, E, K); Beneficiaries/respondents: Third and Fourth Respondents (B and C families); Representative of Grandchildren and Remoter Issue of D: Mrs Davies
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Trustee Application for Directions / Interlocutory Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for three months for without prejudice discussions/mediation; embargo on distributions from D Settlement discharged; other issues deferred.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Discretion, Surrender of Discretion, Beneficiary Rights, Disclosure Orders, Trustee Fees, Conflict of Interest, Trust Administration, Tax Liabilities, Asset Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RBC
Representor/trustee
First Respondents (D family, including H, G, E, K)
Beneficiaries/respondents
Third and Fourth Respondents (B and C families)
Beneficiaries/respondents
Mrs Davies
Representative of Grandchildren and Remoter Issue of D
Procedural Posture
Trustee Application for Directions / Interlocutory Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee (RBC) should be permitted to surrender its discretion to the Court due to conflicts of interest.
- 2 Whether the Court can order disclosure of information from beneficiary directors (D directors) regarding companies owned by the trusts.
- 3 Whether distributions from the D Settlement should remain embargoed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted the surrender of RBC's discretion as trustee due to genuine conflicts of interest arising from disputes among beneficiaries and allegations of improper benefit by D directors. The Court adjourned the application for three months to allow for without prejudice discussions or mediation, discharged the embargo on distributions from the D Settlement, and deferred decisions on disclosure orders, trustee fees, and payment of directors' fees pending further submissions and resolution efforts.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for three months for without prejudice discussions/mediation; embargo on distributions from D Settlement discharged; other issues deferred.
Orders
- Application adjourned for three months to allow parties to attempt resolution via discussions or mediation.
- Embargo on distributions from D Settlement discharged; trustee to collect further information before considering applications for distribution.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment