In the matter of Q Trust [2014] JRC 119 (28 May 2014)
The Court held that the trustee's proposed distribution of the Q Trust assets, based on independent valuation and aiming for equality between the L and M beneficiaries, was a proper exercise of discretion in the circumstances. The Court found that further investigation into the settlor's later wishes or the beneficiaries' conduct was not warranted given the lack of funds, the likelihood of further dispute, and the sufficiency of the original intention of equality. The Court approved the trustee's proposal, subject to the discharge of trust liabilities and the practical arrangements for share transfers or bare trusts if cooperation was not forthcoming.
- Citation
- [2014] JRC 119
- Parties
- Applicant/representor (trustee): Herald Trust Company Limited; First Respondents (beneficiaries): L beneficiaries (descendants of settlor's first marriage); Second Respondents (beneficiaries): M beneficiaries (descendants of settlor's second marriage)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Administration / Representation / Final Judgment on Trustee's Application for Blessing of Distribution and Termination of Trust
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; trustee's proposed distribution and termination of the Q Trust approved, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers and Duties, Distribution of Trust Assets, Letters of Wishes, Beneficiary Disputes, Court Blessing of Trustee Decisions, Cross Border Trust Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herald Trust Company Limited
Applicant/representor (trustee)
L beneficiaries (descendants of settlor's first marriage)
First Respondents (beneficiaries)
M beneficiaries (descendants of settlor's second marriage)
Second Respondents (beneficiaries)
Procedural Posture
Trust Administration / Representation / Final Judgment on Trustee's Application for Blessing of Distribution and Termination of Trust
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee's proposed distribution of the Q Trust assets between the L and M beneficiaries should be blessed by the Court
- 2 Whether the trustee's discretion was properly exercised in light of conflicting letters of wishes and ongoing disputes
- 3 Whether the trustee's decision was unduly influenced by its own financial predicament and external litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the trustee's proposed distribution of the Q Trust assets, based on independent valuation and aiming for equality between the L and M beneficiaries, was a proper exercise of discretion in the circumstances. The Court found that further investigation into the settlor's later wishes or the beneficiaries' conduct was not warranted given the lack of funds, the likelihood of further dispute, and the sufficiency of the original intention of equality. The Court approved the trustee's proposal, subject to the discharge of trust liabilities and the practical arrangements for share transfers or bare trusts if cooperation was not forthcoming.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; trustee's proposed distribution and termination of the Q Trust approved, subject to conditions.
Orders
- The trustee is authorised to distribute the Q Trust assets as proposed, effecting an equalisation between the L and M beneficiaries based on the Reding Consulting valuation.
- The L beneficiaries to receive the shares in R (and thus control of U), subject to undertaking to discharge all trust liabilities.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment