1998/203 - Gleeson v Webster [1998] UR 203 (15 October 1998)
The Court declined to vary the Consent Order, determining that the matter should remain as is until the December ancillary hearing, as no compelling reason was provided to justify early sale or variation.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 203
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Francine Helen Gleeson; Defendant/applicant: Martin Guy Webster
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vary Consent Order / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Consent Order, Sale of Matrimonial Property, Undertakings to Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francine Helen Gleeson
Plaintiff/respondent
Martin Guy Webster
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Application to Vary Consent Order / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Defendant should be released from or have varied his undertakings to the Court to enable sale of property 'Ellerslie' before ancillary hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to vary the Consent Order, determining that the matter should remain as is until the December ancillary hearing, as no compelling reason was provided to justify early sale or variation.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- No variation of Consent Order; undertakings remain in force until ancillary hearing in December.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment