In the matter of the RR Settlement [2011] JRC 141A (20 July 2011)
The Trustees' decision to appoint the trust fund to O Trust, assuming it is a valid charitable beneficiary, is one a reasonable trustee could have reached; the court sanctions the proposed action as lawful, rational, and not vitiated by conflict.
- Citation
- [2011] JRC 141A
- Parties
- Applicant: A Trustees Limited; Intended Beneficiary: O Trust; Beneficiary: D Foundation
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Application / Application for Court Sanction
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Court Sanction of Trustee Decisions, Addition of Beneficiaries, Charitable Status Determination, Protector Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Trustees Limited
Applicant
O Trust
Intended Beneficiary
D Foundation
Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Trust Application / Application for Court Sanction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trustees' proposed appointment of the trust fund to O Trust is lawful and within their powers
- 2 Whether O Trust is a valid charitable beneficiary under the RR Settlement
- 3 Whether Trustees acted reasonably and without conflict of interest
Ratio Decidendi
The Trustees' decision to appoint the trust fund to O Trust, assuming it is a valid charitable beneficiary, is one a reasonable trustee could have reached; the court sanctions the proposed action as lawful, rational, and not vitiated by conflict.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Court sanctions and blesses the Trustees' proposed appointment of the entire trust fund to O Trust, subject to Trustees verifying O Trust's charitable status.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment