A -v- B (Family) [2013] JRC 168A (28 August 2013)
- Citation
- [2013] JRC 168A
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing Evidence
More details
- Posture
- Contempt Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing Evidence
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court does not find B in contempt on the evidence before it, but makes clear that any further non-compliance will be treated as contempt and may result in imprisonment.
Court disposition
No finding of contempt; directions given for future compliance.
Orders
- Father to bring C to the Le Bas Centre on 29th August 2013 at 9:30am for handover.
- If father fails to absent himself immediately after handover, police to be called with power of arrest to present father in court for contempt.
- Court to sit after 11:00am the following day to deal with any contempt.
- Father undertakes not to contact the child after handover until she arrives in the UK.
- Costs adjourned to a date to be fixed.
02
Material facts
Parties
B
FatherC
ChildMother
Mother Counsel: Mr KeanAmounts and remedies
- Handover Date: 29
- Handover Time: 9.5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Contempt Proceedings / Judgment After Hearing Evidence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether B is in contempt of court for failing to comply with child handover orders
- 02
Appropriate measures to ensure compliance with court orders
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant seeks enforcement of the court's child handover order and alleges non-compliance amounting to contempt.
- Respondent
- B claims he was at his wit's end, did not know what to do, and did not intentionally disobey the order.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
general legal principle
Contempt of court must be proved to the criminal standard.
- 02
general legal principle
Court orders must be obeyed and non-compliance may result in contempt proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court does not find B in contempt on the evidence before it, but makes clear that any further non-compliance will be treated as contempt and may result in imprisonment.
Obiter and limits
- The court has gravest reservations about the current position and is determined that its orders are to be obeyed.
- Significant emotional harm to the child may result from incidents of non-compliance.
- The child is not to be given a choice in the matter; the orders must be followed.
Court disposition
No finding of contempt; directions given for future compliance.
- Father to bring C to the Le Bas Centre on 29th August 2013 at 9:30am for handover.
- If father fails to absent himself immediately after handover, police to be called with power of arrest to present father in court for contempt.
- Court to sit after 11:00am the following day to deal with any contempt.
- Father undertakes not to contact the child after handover until she arrives in the UK.
- Costs adjourned to a date to be fixed.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
judgment the deputy bailiff: 1. B, the Court does not find that you are in contempt, and does not find it proved to the criminal standard. Nonetheless, it is right to tell you that we have gravest reservations about the position we are in and we are absolutely determined that both the Bristol court order and our own order last Friday are to be obeyed.
2. In the course of your evidence just now you said words to the effect of you were at your wit's end and you did not know what to do and there is, in our minds, a real risk that tomorrow may see a repeat, if we are not careful, of what happened last Saturday, and that is absolutely not going to be. Now we had wondered whether it would be appropriate for you to call your wife at this stage and ask her to deliver C to the Court now, for the handover to take place and if that would be helpful, because you want to abide by the Court's orders, that is something we are prepared to do. I am sure Mr Kean would be prepared to wait and facilitate in that handover. An option might be that the mother and the social worker should turn up at your house tomorrow and collect the child and you will be there and when they arrive you will absent yourself and no holding on to you will do, you will absent yourself. Because if we get a repeat of what happened on Saturday, the Court is likely to treat that as a contempt because I am making myself much clearer to you today, than I did on Friday afternoon. And if so you will go to prison.
3. The Court is absolutely not prepared for this to continue. All these incidents are capable of doing significant emotional harm to this child. But the real significant emotional harm appears to us to be in an approach which allows the child to think that she has some choice in the matter. The Court's orders do not give her that choice. She is to do as she is told, and you are to do as you are told.
4. The father will bring C to the Le Bas Centre on 29 th August, 2013, at 9:30am The Court directs that if the father then fails to absent himself immediately so that the mother can leave with C thereafter, the police should be called with a power of arrest so that they present the father in court to answer the contempt forthwith. Should this happen the Court will sit tomorrow morning at any time after 11:00am and deal with whatever is presented including any contempt. The Court notes the father's undertaking not to contact the child after delivering her into her mother's care until she has arrived back in the UK.
5. The Court adjourns the matter of costs for a date to be fixed. No Authorities Page Last Updated: 03 Feb 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.