A v Minister for Home Affairs 7-Feb-2019 [2019] JRC 017 (07 February 2019)
The applicant's case involves fundamental human rights and proportionality; the consequences of the decision are profound. There is an arguable ground for judicial review with a realistic prospect of success, no alternative remedy, and no discretionary bar such as delay. Leave is granted on all grounds.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 017
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Leave Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Leave granted to seek judicial review on all grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Judicial Review, Ministerial Decision, Human Rights, Proportionality, Reasons for Decision
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
Minister for Home Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Leave Application / Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted for judicial review of the Minister's refusal of asylum
- 2 Whether the Minister's reasons for refusal were adequate and intelligible
- 3 Whether the Minister took into account irrelevant or failed to consider relevant factors
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's case involves fundamental human rights and proportionality; the consequences of the decision are profound. There is an arguable ground for judicial review with a realistic prospect of success, no alternative remedy, and no discretionary bar such as delay. Leave is granted on all grounds.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to seek judicial review on all grounds.
Orders
- Leave to apply for judicial review granted.
- Effect of the Minister's decision stayed until determination of judicial review.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment