Jersey Judgment

Abacus (C.I.) Ltd. v Hirschfield [2001] JLR 530 (17 September 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court may accept a trustee's surrender of discretion when there is good reason, including the relevance of ongoing litigation, and must then exercise that discretion in the best interests of the trust and beneficiaries as if it were the trustee.

Court disposition

Court accepted the trustee's surrender of discretion and undertook to exercise it.

Orders

  • Court to exercise discretion in best interests of trust and beneficiaries

02

Material facts

Parties

Abacus (C. I.) Ltd.

Trustee

Hirschfield

Beneficiary

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application for Directions / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The trustee seeks the court's directions and surrenders its discretion due to relevant ongoing litigation.
Respondent
The beneficiary's position is not detailed in the summary.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey trust law

    Court may accept trustee's surrender of discretion if there is good reason, such as the outcome of litigation currently before the court.

  2. 02

    Jersey trust law

    Court must exercise discretion in the best interests of the trust and beneficiaries as if it were the trustee.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court may accept a trustee's surrender of discretion when there is good reason, including the relevance of ongoing litigation, and must then exercise that discretion in the best interests of the trust and beneficiaries as if it were the trustee.

Court disposition

Court accepted the trustee's surrender of discretion and undertook to exercise it.

  • Court to exercise discretion in best interests of trust and beneficiaries

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2001] JLR 530

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Abacus (C. I.) Ltd. v Hirschfield [2001] JLR 530 (17 September 2001) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010530.html Cite as: [2001] JLR 530 [ New search ] [ Help ] Abacus (C. I.) Ltd. v Hirschfield 2001 JLR 530 (17 September 2001) Trusts-powers and duties of trustees-application for directions-court may accept trustee's surrender of discretion if good reason, e.g. outcome of litigation currently before court relevant consideration in exercise of discretion-court to exercise discretion in best interest of trust and bene ficiaries as if trustee The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2001 JLR 530 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2001/JLR010530.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.