Abdel Rahman v Chase Bank [1990] JLR 59 (23 March 1990)
A breach of an undertaking to the court is to be treated as contempt of court, in the same manner as a breach of an injunction.
- Citation
- [1990] JLR 59
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdel Rahman; Respondent: Chase Bank
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- breach of undertaking treated as contempt of court
- Legal Topics
- Undertaking to Court, Breach of Undertaking, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Abdel Rahman
Applicant
Chase Bank
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether breach of an undertaking to the court should be treated as contempt of court
Ratio Decidendi
A breach of an undertaking to the court is to be treated as contempt of court, in the same manner as a breach of an injunction.
Court Disposition
breach of undertaking treated as contempt of court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment