Acturus Properties Ltd. v Att. Gen. [2001] JLR 43 (12 January 2001)

A person forced to disclose confidential information in an investigation under the Investigation of Fraud (Jersey) Law 1991 has locus standi to challenge the decision requiring disclosure.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2001] JLR 43
Parties: Applicant: Acturus Properties Ltd.; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 12 January 2001
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review / Decision on Locus Standi
Outcome: locus standi recognized
Legal Topics: Judicial Review, Locus Standi, Confidential Information, Investigation, Investigation of Fraud (jersey) Law 1991

Administrative Law Judicial Review Locus Standi Confidential Information Investigation Investigation of Fraud (jersey) Law 1991

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Acturus Properties Ltd.

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Decision on Locus Standi

Legal Issues

1 Whether a person compelled to disclose confidential information under the Investigation of Fraud (Jersey) Law 1991 has locus standi to challenge the disclosure requirement

Ratio Decidendi

A person forced to disclose confidential information in an investigation under the Investigation of Fraud (Jersey) Law 1991 has locus standi to challenge the decision requiring disclosure.

Court Disposition

locus standi recognized

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.