Representation of the Batonnier v [2003] JRC 077 (12 May 2003)
Advocate Le Quesne breached Rule 15(2) by failing to appreciate the distinction between TGWU and untraced employees, resulting in misapplication of client funds. The conduct did not amount to dishonesty but constituted professional misconduct warranting sanction.
- Citation
- [2003] JRC 077
- Parties
- Complainant: Bâtonnier; Respondent: Advocate David Le Quesne; Respondent: Advocate Rose Colley
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Advocate Le Quesne found guilty of professional misconduct; Advocate Colley discharged with no adverse finding.
- Legal Topics
- Misapplication of Client Funds, Breach of Code of Conduct, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bâtonnier
Complainant
Advocate David Le Quesne
Respondent
Advocate Rose Colley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Advocate Le Quesne breached Rule 15(2) of the Code of Conduct by misapplying client funds
- 2 Whether the conduct amounted to dishonesty or professional misconduct
- 3 Appropriate sanction for breach of professional rules
Ratio Decidendi
Advocate Le Quesne breached Rule 15(2) by failing to appreciate the distinction between TGWU and untraced employees, resulting in misapplication of client funds. The conduct did not amount to dishonesty but constituted professional misconduct warranting sanction.
Court Disposition
Advocate Le Quesne found guilty of professional misconduct; Advocate Colley discharged with no adverse finding.
Orders
- Advocate Le Quesne fined £10,000 for breach of Rule 15(2) of the Code of Conduct.
- Proceedings against Advocate Colley discontinued; she is discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment