AG -v- Ahier [2016] JRC 230 (09 December 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 230
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the defendant's recent willingness to address underlying trauma constituted exceptional circumstances, justifying the suspension of the otherwise mandatory custodial sentence for assaulting a police officer.
Court disposition
suspended custodial sentence
Orders
- 12 months' imprisonment suspended for 1 year
- No probation order imposed
- Encouragement to seek voluntary treatment for past sexual abuse
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown (Defendant)
Defendant Counsel: Advocate DaleAttorney General (AG)
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Community Service Hours (2014 Sentence): 190
- Imprisonment (grave and Criminal Assault) Months: 9
- Imprisonment (2014 Offences, Concurrent) Months: 3
- Imprisonment (2014 Offences, Concurrent) Months: 1
- Imprisonment (2014 Offences, Concurrent) Months: 2
- Imprisonment (probation Breach) Months: 1
- Total Imprisonment (consecutive) Months: 12
- Suspension Period (years): 1
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether immediate imprisonment is required for assault on a police officer given prior warnings and breach of probation
- 02
Whether exceptional circumstances justify suspension of sentence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Advocate Dale argued that the defendant has begun to address childhood sexual abuse issues, supported by psychiatric evidence, and is poised to attempt rehabilitation, making this an exceptional case.
- Respondent
- The prosecution relied on the gravity of assaulting a police officer, the defendant's prior breaches, and the inappropriateness of probation or community service due to health and compliance issues.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
AG-v-Cox [2014] JRC 115
Assaults on police officers generally attract immediate custodial sentences unless exceptional circumstances exist.
- 02
Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences) (Jersey) Law 2003
Suspension of prison sentences is permissible in exceptional cases.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the defendant's recent willingness to address underlying trauma constituted exceptional circumstances, justifying the suspension of the otherwise mandatory custodial sentence for assaulting a police officer.
Obiter and limits
- The court urged the defendant to seek voluntary treatment for past sexual abuse, noting that failure to do so may result in future imprisonment.
Court disposition
suspended custodial sentence
- 12 months' imprisonment suspended for 1 year
- No probation order imposed
- Encouragement to seek voluntary treatment for past sexual abuse
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. On 23 rd May, 2014, you were sentenced by this Court to 190 hours' community service for various offences. The time for carrying that out was extended because of your ill health, but now you have committed this grave and criminal assault on a police officer. We accept that as grave and criminal assaults go this was very much at the bottom of the scale. But police officers are entitled to look to the Court for protection and the Court has regularly stated that those who assault police officers must expect a prison sentence, save in exceptional circumstances. Furthermore you were warned at the time when the Court imposed the community service of the likely consequences of further offending. So when the members of the Court first read the papers, there seemed to be no alternative but to an immediate prison sentence, particularly given the recommendation in all the reports that a probation order would be inappropriate because of your repeated failures to comply with such an order and your inability now on health grounds to carry out community service.
2. Advocate Dale has spoken very powerfully on your behalf. The key factor in the Court's opinion is that for the first time, you have begun to speak of the sexual abuse which you suffered as a child, and Dr Briggs in his psychiatric report has said that he considers this to be very significant. He advises that you are poised to try and address the issues which confront you and in particular matters which arise out of that and he feels that, if successful, this would contribute to your beginning the process of turning your life around, as you say to us that you wish to. You must realise though this will not be an easy process. Nevertheless, we have just been persuaded that in the light of these factors this is an exceptional case which allows us to suspend the prison sentence that has to be imposed.
3. In relation to the count of grave and criminal assault the sentence is 9 months' imprisonment. In relation to the offences for which you were sentenced in 2014, the sentence is as follows: Count 2; 3 months' imprisonment, Count 3; 3 months' imprisonment, Count 4; 1 months' imprisonment, Count 5; 2 months' imprisonment and for the breach of the earlier Probation Order; 1 month's imprisonment, all of those to be concurrent, but consecutive to the 9 months' imprisonment, that makes a total of 12 months' imprisonment. However, we are going to suspend that for 1 year. That means that if you commit any further offence within that year, then you will not only be punished for that new offence, but on top of it, you will face the prospect of serving this 12 months' imprisonment. So that is what we are going to do.
4. We urge you to take up the suggestion of treatment in relation to your sexual abuse in the past. The Probation Service I know will point you in the right direction in order to find the right person with whom you should begin this process, but you must do it. It is voluntary on your part, we cannot make it a condition but you say you want to try and turn your life around; well if that is true then now is your opportunity to seek help. The Probation Service, although there is going to be no probation order, will I have no doubt, be willing to help and to try and find the right person with whom you should begin this process. But if you do not go to them and ask for it, then it will not happen, and if it does not happen then we fear you will be back here very quickly and if you are back here you will almost certainly go to prison; do you understand? Very well that is the sentence of the Court. Authorities Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders) (Jersey) Law 2001. Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences) (Jersey) Law 2003. Costs in Criminal Cases (Jersey) Law 1961. AG-v-Cox [2014] JRC 115 . Harrison-v-AG [2004 JLR 111 ] (extract). AG-v-Bannon [2003] JRC 190 . AG-v-Vattier [2007] JRC 105 . AG-v-A [2013] JRC 129 . AG-v-Barwise [2009] JRC 182 . AG-v-Cox [2009] JRC 209. AG-v-Dauny [2010] JRC 141 . AG-v-Louis [2010] JRC 170 . Whelan's Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (Third edition). Page Last Updated: 06 Jan 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.