Jersey Judgment

AG -v- B [2015] JRC 022 (30 January 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the defendant's age, lack of prior convictions, and the availability of effective non-custodial measures, a custodial sentence is not justified. Probation and restrictive orders are sufficient to protect the public and address the offending.

Court disposition

non-custodial sentence (probation) with restrictive orders

Orders

  • 18 months' probation with mandatory work as directed by probation officer and Dr David Briggs
  • Completion of alcohol and drug assessment
  • Subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010 for 5 years
  • Restrictive orders regarding internet device use, contact with minors, and supervision, all for 5 years
  • Forfeiture and destruction of USB stick (Exhibit M2) and black Nokia mobile telephone

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown (Defendant, 18 years old)

Defendant

The Crown

Prosecutor

Amounts and remedies

  • Probation Period: 18
  • Sex Offender Registration Period: 5
  • Restrictive Orders Period: 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defendant is 18, has no previous convictions, and can be dealt with by means other than custody, as supported by background reports and recommendations from the Probation Service.
Respondent
The offences are serious and would usually call for a custodial sentence, but the Crown agrees to the restrictive orders and probation as appropriate in this case.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Young Offenders (Jersey) Law 1994, Article 4

    Custodial sentences for young offenders should only be imposed if no other method is appropriate, considering statutory criteria.

  2. 02

    Young Offenders (Jersey) Law 1994

    Protection of the public can be achieved through non-custodial sentences with appropriate restrictions and supervision.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the defendant's age, lack of prior convictions, and the availability of effective non-custodial measures, a custodial sentence is not justified. Probation and restrictive orders are sufficient to protect the public and address the offending.

Obiter and limits

  • The seriousness of the offences requires the defendant's full commitment to probation and rehabilitation.
  • Future compliance with probation and restrictions is essential to avoid further offending and potential custody.

Court disposition

non-custodial sentence (probation) with restrictive orders

  • 18 months' probation with mandatory work as directed by probation officer and Dr David Briggs
  • Completion of alcohol and drug assessment
  • Subject to notification requirements under the Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010 for 5 years
  • Restrictive orders regarding internet device use, contact with minors, and supervision, all for 5 years
  • Forfeiture and destruction of USB stick (Exhibit M2) and black Nokia mobile telephone

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2015] JRC 022

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. You are here to be sentenced on counts of making indecent images, possession of drugs (a personal amount of synthetic cannabis), some telecommunications offences including some messages and offensive pictures of yourself, and inciting the making of indecent images, encouraging a local girl who was aged 13, to send pictures of herself to you. The indecent image offences are serious offences and will usually call for a prison or custodial sentence and you should realise that.

2. Because you are 18 we are required to have regard to the Law which tells us not to impose a custodial sentence on you unless no other way of dealing with you is appropriate and we have listened very carefully to your counsel and we have considered the terms of the law and we have no doubt at all in the light of the background reports that we have had that there is a different way of dealing with these offences and we are not going to send you to the Young Offenders Centre.

3. When I say that, it is important that you realise how serious the offences are, and how you need to commit to the Probation Service and to Dr Briggs in the work that they will be doing with you and which you need to do as well.

4. The relevant provisions of the Young Offenders (Jersey) Law 1994 which I have mentioned, are first of all, does the person have a history of failing to respond to non-custodial penalties and you have no previous convictions so that does not apply to you. The second is whether a custodial sentence would be adequate to protect the public from serious harm from the person and we take the view, actually, that the protection of the public is best achieved in this case by a non-custodial sentence and by an alternative method of dealing with it. And so we were left to consider the third provision in Article 4 of the Law, whether the offence or the totality of offending is so serious that a non-custodial sentence cannot be justified.

5. Well, that provision needs to be reflected by whether there is any other method of dealing with you which is appropriate and because we are looking to protect the public and because of your age, there is another way of dealing with you and that is why we propose to follow the recommendations of the Probation Service and you will be put on 18 months' probation.

6. You can expect, in the course of those months of the Probation Order that there will be an amount of work which you will have to do as directed by the probation officer. You will have to complete some one-to-one work with Dr David Briggs which will focus on challenging your attitudes towards sex, engaging positively with efforts to secure employment or further education and stable accommodation, and undertaking a full alcohol and drug assessment. And clearly you must, for your own future, think quite hard about your cannabis taking; I am pleased to note that you have apparently stopped taking cannabis for the last month or so, and you have to keep that up because if you were to relax that would be a serious risk for you and for further offending which you might then commit and then you will be back in court. So it is in your interests, and as is so often the case, the future, your future, is in your hands and you need to give some serious thought to that.

7. Now you are subject to the notification requirements under the Sex Offenders Law and we order that you cannot apply to come off the Sex Offenders Register, to have the notification requirements disapplied to you, for 5 years. You are also going to be subject to a number of restrictive orders which are the ones that the Crown has asked for and which your counsel has agreed. They are these:- (i) That you produce to a police officer forthwith on request for examination, at any time, any computer or device which may access the internet, or any device which can store images electronically, which belongs to you or is in your possession, it being noted that such a request may be made anywhere, including by the police attending at your place of residence. (ii) You are prohibited from owning, or having in your possession, or having access to any device capable of accessing the internet unless:- (a) It has the capacity to retain and display the history of internet use. (b) And you ensure that such history is not deleted. So you are not to delete the history if you do have such a device. (iii) You are not to have any direct or indirect contact, in any way whatsoever (including but not limited to, contact through the mediums of email, social networking sites, texting or any other form of electronic communication) with any person under the age of 16, unless that is inadvertent and/or

unavoidable. (iv) And you are prohibited from being alone with any child under the age of 16, aside from such contact which is inadvertent, that means accidental, or unavoidable. They will be considered to be alone if there is not a parent, or a guardian or responsible adult present who is over the age of 21 and is aware of the convictions which you have; and (v) Where you find yourself alone or in contact with a child under the age of 16 and the contact has been inadvertent, accidental or unavoidable, you must remove yourself from that position, you have to leave the room, as soon as reasonably practicable. And you must realise that if you breach any of these restraining orders, that itself is a criminal offence and will render you liable to being sent to the Young Offenders Institute or to prison. Those restraining orders will stay in place for 5 years as well.

8. In addition the Court orders the forfeiture and destruction of the USB stick, that is Exhibit M2 and the black Nokia mobile telephone. Authorities Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010. Young Offenders (Jersey) Law 1994. AG-v-Godson and Crowley [2013] JRC 091 . AG-v-Olivotti [2013] JRC 128 . Page Last Updated: 16 Jan 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG-v-Godson and Crowley [2013] JRC 091

Case cited

AG-v-Olivotti [2013] JRC 128

Case cited

Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Young Offenders (Jersey) Law 1994

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.