Jersey Judgment

AG v Bellot [2023] JRC 202 (27 October 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A suspended sentence of 3 days' imprisonment for 12 months is more appropriate than a fine in the circumstances; reasons to follow in a detailed judgment.

Court disposition

suspended sentence imposed

Orders

  • 3 days' imprisonment suspended for 12 months
  • Defendant to sign a form with the Greffier
  • Defendant released immediately
  • Time for appeal notice filing suspended until reasons are handed down

02

Material facts

Parties

Crown

Prosecution

Miss Bellot

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment Duration: 3
  • Suspension Period (months): 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Crown sought a different conclusion, likely advocating for a fine or immediate custodial sentence.
Respondent
The defendant's position is not detailed, but the court found a suspended sentence more appropriate.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Justice Act 1925

    Suspended sentences may be imposed instead of fines where appropriate.

  2. 02

    Criminal Justice Act 1925

    Activation of suspended sentence upon reoffending within suspension period.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A suspended sentence of 3 days' imprisonment for 12 months is more appropriate than a fine in the circumstances; reasons to follow in a detailed judgment.

Obiter and limits

  • The time for filing a notice of appeal will not run until the reasons have been handed down.

Court disposition

suspended sentence imposed

  • 3 days' imprisonment suspended for 12 months
  • Defendant to sign a form with the Greffier
  • Defendant released immediately
  • Time for appeal notice filing suspended until reasons are handed down

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2023] JRC 202

JUDGMENT THE Lieutenant BAILIFF: 1. Would you stand up please.

2. For reasons that will follow in a judgment which we shall deliver later, we are not accepting the Crown's conclusions in this case. There will be a sentence of 3 days' imprisonment, which will be suspended for 12 months.

3. I must warn you that if you should reoffend within the period of twelve months, if you do anything that amounts to criminal conduct, the sentence will be activated and you will have to serve it. But at the moment you will walk out of this court today free. We think that is a more appropriate determination than a fine; the reasons why we think that will appear in our judgment in due course.

4. I must ask you to stay Miss Bellot please, after court and sign a form with the Greffier here. You need to stay in court afterwards and sign a form, thank you.

5. The time limited for filing a notice of appeal will not run until the reasons have been handed down. Authorities R v Smith (Amanda Ann) [2016] EWCA Crim 1562. R v D [2004] EWCA Crim 1271. Criminal Justice Act 1925. Page Last Updated: 29 Nov 2023 Back to top About JLIB Accessibility Contacts Disclaimer Feedback Privacy policy Site map © Jersey Legal Information Board 2001- This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser . If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

R v Smith (Amanda Ann) [2016] EWCA Crim 1562

Case cited

R v D [2004] EWCA Crim 1271

Case cited

Criminal Justice Act 1925

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.