Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Blood [2015] JRC 201 (02 October 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Community service is imposed instead of imprisonment due to mitigation, enabling the defendant to make amends and repay the sum obtained.

Court disposition

Community service imposed in lieu of imprisonment; compensation ordered.

Orders

  • Community Service of 150 hours (equivalent to 9 months' imprisonment)
  • Compensation of £250 per month starting within 7 days and payable on the 9th day of each month until £11,966.29 is paid in full
  • In default of payment, 9 months' imprisonment

02

Material facts

Parties

Defendant

Defendant Counsel: Advocate Bell

Social Security Department

Prosecutor

Amounts and remedies

  • Income Support Fraudulently Obtained: GBP 11,966.29
  • Community Service Hours: 150
  • Monthly Compensation Payment: GBP 250

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Mitigation put forward by Advocate Bell emphasized defendant's lack of prior convictions, low risk of reoffending, educational achievements, and employment status.
Respondent
The Crown accepted there was no plan to commit an offence at the outset but highlighted the fraudulent conduct and the need for deterrence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    AG v Harris 1997/57

    A fraud on the Social Security Department is not a victimless crime; the starting point must be a sentence of imprisonment.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Community service is imposed instead of imprisonment due to mitigation, enabling the defendant to make amends and repay the sum obtained.

Obiter and limits

  • Delays in investigation and prosecution were partly due to accommodating defendant's educational commitments.
  • The defendant's employment and educational achievements were considered in sentencing.

Court disposition

Community service imposed in lieu of imprisonment; compensation ordered.

  • Community Service of 150 hours (equivalent to 9 months' imprisonment)
  • Compensation of £250 per month starting within 7 days and payable on the 9th day of each month until £11,966.29 is paid in full
  • In default of payment, 9 months' imprisonment

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2015] JRC 201

JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. The defendant, who is aged 35, stands to be sentenced for one count of failing to notify a change of circumstances to the Social Security Department thereby obtaining £11,966.29 in income support that was not properly payable to her. She declared that she had paid rent to her mother of £700 per month, which was the case at the very outset, but shortly thereafter, she reached agreement with her mother that no further rent needed to be paid. And none was paid until the arrangement was discovered.

2. The period involved was from 8 th June, 2011 to 7 th September, 2012, some 15 months. The original claim form contained the usual warning, namely "any person who knowingly makes any false statement or false representation for the person obtaining benefit for themselves or for someone else commits a criminal offence for which they may be prosecuted and may also be required to repay the amount fraudulently obtained" as did two change of circumstance forms which she subsequently submitted in relation to her employment.

3. In September 2012 on a routine review the defendant was asked to provide bank statements for three months and those showed that no rent had been paid. When challenged about this, a further bank statement showing a withdrawal in April 2012 in the sum of £700, was sent in by the defendant, who said that it represented rent for her mother and which she subsequently admitted she had forged. She further forged two letters from her mother corroborating her own written explanation that she had not paid rent to her mother over a three month period of that summer which she described as a temporary suspension of payments that had been a genuine error. She claimed that she had paid her mother the arrears for this period which she hoped would adequately resolve matters with the Department. She eventually accepted in interview that in fact no rent had been paid at all over the 15-month period involved.

4. The defendant is well-educated, having just completed a law degree and an LPC course, and she has recently secured employment with an intellectual property law firm. She has no previous convictions and is assessed at a low risk of reoffending. There was a delay of 11 months within the fraud investigation department in pursuing this matter during which she had, in fact, been employed on a temporary basis by the Social Security Department and she was not interviewed under caution until February 2014. The file was not completed and referred to the police legal advisors until August or September 2014. The delays since then have largely been as a result of accommodating the defendant's educational commitments.

5. The Crown has accepted that there was no plan to commit an offence when she first submitted her application form.

6. We have considered the mitigation put forward by Advocate Bell very carefully. As stated in AG-v-Harris 1997/57 "A fraud on the Social Security Department is not a victimless crime." and the starting point must be a sentence of imprisonment. In this case, having taken into account the mitigation, and on balance, we have decided that the alternative to imprisonment, namely community service, is the right sentence to be imposed for two reasons:- (i) It will enable the defendant to make amends to the community she has defrauded by way of a lengthy period of community service; and (ii) It will enable her to remain in employment and to repay the sum she has wrongly obtained in full.

7. You are therefore sentenced as follows to Community Service of 150 hours', which is the equivalent to 9 months' imprisonment.

8. We also order you to pay compensation of £250 per month starting within 7 days and payable thereafter on the 9 th day of each month until the sum of £11, 966.29 has been paid in full and in default of such payment you will serve a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment. Authorities AG v Morin [2010] JRC 217D . R v Graham and Whatley [2004] EWCA Crim 2755 . AG v Harris 1997/57. AG v Turner [2012] JRC 147 . Whelan on Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey 3rd Edition. Page Last Updated: 27 Sep 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG v Morin [2010] JRC 217D

Case cited

R v Graham and Whatley [2004] EWCA Crim 2755

Case cited

AG v Harris 1997/57

Case cited

AG v Turner [2012] JRC 147

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.