Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Botting [2016] JRC 119 (12 July 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant failed to comply with the community service order, was given a final chance previously, and is no longer suitable for the scheme; therefore, the only appropriate order is to impose the original custodial sentence with credit for hours served.

Court disposition

community service and probation orders discharged; custodial sentence imposed

Orders

  • On First Indictment, Count 1: 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment
  • On First Indictment, Count 2: 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 1: 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 2: 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 3: 10 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 6: 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 7: 3 months' imprisonment, consecutive
  • Total sentence: 16 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment
  • Community Service and Probation Orders discharged

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr Botting

Defendant Counsel: Advocate Steenson

Amounts and remedies

  • Total Custodial Sentence: months 16.5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing After Breach of Community Service Order

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Advocate Steenson urged the court to continue the current community service order, possibly with additional hours, citing the defendant's character.
Respondent
The officers stated the defendant was no longer suitable for the community service scheme due to non-compliance.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 7(4) of the Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001

    A court may impose the original custodial sentence for breach of a community service order, giving credit for hours completed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant failed to comply with the community service order, was given a final chance previously, and is no longer suitable for the scheme; therefore, the only appropriate order is to impose the original custodial sentence with credit for hours served.

Obiter and limits

  • The court reminded the defendant that he had previously come very close to a custodial sentence and was given an absolutely last chance.

Court disposition

community service and probation orders discharged; custodial sentence imposed

  • On First Indictment, Count 1: 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment
  • On First Indictment, Count 2: 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 1: 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 2: 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 3: 10 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 6: 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent
  • On Second Indictment, Count 7: 3 months' imprisonment, consecutive
  • Total sentence: 16 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment
  • Community Service and Probation Orders discharged

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2016] JRC 119

JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. A number of points have been raised this morning which we want to deal with by way of a written judgment which will be issued in due course but we have made our decisions which we can announce now.

2. The Court is satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt that the defendant has failed to comply with his obligations under Article 7(4) of the Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001 , namely to perform the number of hours specified to the satisfaction of the officers.

3. Having regard to Article 7(4) of the Law, the Court has given careful consideration to the options available to it. In particular we have considered whether, as urged by Advocate Steenson, the current order should continue, perhaps with additional hours being added. However, the officers have made it clear that the defendant is no longer suitable for the scheme and in our view we would therefore , in the light of this, and in the light of what Advocate Steenson has said about the defendant's character, setting the defendant up to fail.

4. Secondly he was given absolutely the last chance by the sentencing court. It is worth perhaps just reminding the defendant of what the Court said again:- "4 We are going to avoid a custodial sentence but I want you both to know how close you have come to it. Mr Botting, we are fairly circumspect - we are not sure - about accepting the explanations you have given. We are giving you an absolutely last chance. You can count your life on it that you have never been as close to receiving a very substantial custodial sentence. One of the reasons that we are going to avoid in this case is that you have actually served 4 months or so in prison so far and we think that it gives us the opportunity of taking something of a chance with you and imposing a non-custodial sentence in respect of these offences." 5. In view of this and all the other matters that are before us we have concluded that the only order that we can make is to impose upon the defendant the sentence that the Court would have imposed for that original offending, giving him credit for the hours that he has done.

6. On the First Indictment, on Count 1 you are sentenced to 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment, on Count 2 you are sentenced to 13 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment, concurrent. On the Second Indictment on Count 1 you are sentenced to 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent, on Count 2; 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent, Count 3; 10 months' imprisonment, concurrent, Count 4; 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent, Count 6; 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent and Count 7; 3 months' imprisonment, consecutive. That makes a total of 16 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment.

7. We also discharge the Community Service and Probation Orders. Authorities Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001. Page Last Updated: 26 Jul 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.