AG -v- Brennan [2016] JRC 234 (16 December 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 234
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appropriate sentence for attempting to remove criminal property, taking into account the guilty plea, partial cooperation, remorse, and references, is 12 months' imprisonment. Forfeiture of the seized money is ordered.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 12 months' imprisonment
- forfeiture of £11,660
- no order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution[Defendant Name Not Provided]
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Amount of Criminal Property Seized: GBP 11,660
- Courier Fee: GBP 500
- Imprisonment Term: months 12
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Appropriate sentence for attempting to remove criminal property from Jersey
- 02
Whether mitigation and guilty plea affect sentence
- 03
Whether forfeiture of seized money is appropriate
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The defendant pleaded guilty, offered a basis for the plea accepted by the Crown, expressed remorse, and provided references. Sought mitigation based on these factors.
- Respondent
- The Crown accepted the basis of plea, submitted that acting as a courier for criminal property is a serious matter, and requested forfeiture of the money. Sought a higher sentence than that imposed.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's reasoning
Acting as a courier for criminal property facilitates criminal activity and is viewed as a serious offence.
- 02
Court's reasoning
Mitigation such as guilty plea and remorse may reduce sentence but do not excuse the offence.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appropriate sentence for attempting to remove criminal property, taking into account the guilty plea, partial cooperation, remorse, and references, is 12 months' imprisonment. Forfeiture of the seized money is ordered.
Obiter and limits
- Individuals should consider the impact of their criminal activity on their families before engaging in such conduct.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 12 months' imprisonment
- forfeiture of £11,660
- no order as to costs
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced in relation to one count of attempting to remove criminal property from Jersey. We do not need to set out the facts of this matter; they have been amply explored by the Crown in the submissions before us today. You have pleaded guilty and you have offered a basis for that plea which the Crown has accepted.
2. Accordingly we proceed on the basis that you were aware that the money that you were taking, some £11,660, secreted in your car, was money tainted by criminal activity. You were to receive a fee of £500 for acting as a courier.
3. Unlawful activity such as, for example, dealing in drugs, cannot thrive unless individuals are prepared to assist in channelling the criminal process of that conduct back to those who engage in it. Acting as a courier facilitates criminal activity no matter what it is and is accordingly viewed by the Court as a serious matter.
4. You have the benefit of your guilty plea but is could not be said that you were fully cooperative with the authorities in as much as you originally denied having any money to declare and thereafter tried to pass it off as the proceeds of a bet. However your guilty plea is of value in this case and we take it into account.
5. We note the other mitigation available to you. You have expressed your remorse and clearly you are mindful of the effects that your criminal activity has had and will have on your family. As the Court often observes when that submission is made, that is something you really should have thought about before engaging in criminal activity in the first place. We have noted the references given on your behalf which speak well of you.
6. Turning to the appropriate basis of sentence we agree with the Crown as to the factors that need to be considered and indeed with the Crown's analysis of those factors against the facts of this case. However in our view the sentence moved for by the Crown is too high in these circumstances and the correct sentence is one of 12 months' imprisonment.
7. We order the forfeiture of the money as requested by the Crown and make no order as to costs. Authorities Criminal Justice (Forfeiture Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001. Police Force (Disposal of Property)(Jersey) Regulations 1975. AG-v-Turney [2016] JRC 175 . AG-v-Goodwin [2016] JRC 165 . AG-v-Cleaver [2016] JRC 080 . AG-v-Adam [2015] JRC 215 . Page Last Updated: 23 Jan 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.