Jersey Judgment

AG -v- C [2008] JRC 138 (15 August 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the defendant's breach of probation and the seriousness of the offences, community service is warranted under the relevant youth justice legislation, with a reduction to reflect limited involvement.

Court disposition

community service order imposed

Orders

  • 150 hours' community service on Count 1 (concurrent)
  • 150 hours' community service on Count 2 (concurrent)
  • 45 hours' community service on Count 9 (concurrent)
  • 45 hours' community service on Count 10 (concurrent)
  • Alternative sentence: 9 months' youth detention if community service is not completed

02

Material facts

Parties

C

Defendant Counsel: Mr Gollop

Amounts and remedies

  • Community Service Hours (count 1): 150
  • Community Service Hours (count 2): 150
  • Community Service Hours (count 9): 45
  • Community Service Hours (count 10): 45
  • Alternative Youth Detention (months): 9

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Crown submitted that the offences warranted 180 hours' community service.
Respondent
Mr Gollop argued the offences were not serious enough to justify community service and suggested continuing the probation order.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994

    Youth offenders should be sentenced in accordance with Article 4 of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994, prioritizing community service over detention where appropriate.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the defendant's breach of probation and the seriousness of the offences, community service is warranted under the relevant youth justice legislation, with a reduction to reflect limited involvement.

Obiter and limits

  • This is your last chance; failure to comply with community service will result in youth detention.
  • Cultivation and supply of cannabis, even in a minor way, justifies community service.

Court disposition

community service order imposed

  • 150 hours' community service on Count 1 (concurrent)
  • 150 hours' community service on Count 2 (concurrent)
  • 45 hours' community service on Count 9 (concurrent)
  • 45 hours' community service on Count 10 (concurrent)
  • Alternative sentence: 9 months' youth detention if community service is not completed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2008] JRC 138

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. In February you pleaded guilty to offences which involved the production and supply of cannabis, but in the reports which came before the Court you said that you were willing to be placed on probation and to attend the courses that they recommended. You convinced the Probation Service that you were genuine, but in fact you have completely failed to abide by the terms of the Probation Order. You have missed appointments, you have been warned of the consequences but still you have failed to keep any appointments. This means of course, that the Probation Service can not give you the help that they wish to and which the Court wanted them to.

2. The original conclusions of the Crown were that you should be sentenced to 180 hours' community service. Mr Gollop says the offences you committed are not serious enough to justify community service. We have to say that we disagree. Even in the comparatively minor way in which you were involved, cultivation and supply of cannabis is certainly enough to attract community service in the appropriate case. There is no question in our judgment of simply continuing this Probation Order as Mr Gollop has suggested; you have ignored that order, you have had your chance, you must now be punished. The only question is whether it should be youth detention or community service; but you are only 17 and the provisions of Article 4 of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994 apply and therefore we are going to impose community service. We are also going to reduce the conclusions slightly to mark your limited involvement.

3. On Count 1; 150 hours' Community Service, on Count 2; 150 hours', Community Service, Count 9; 45 hours' Community Service, and on Count 10; 45 hours' Community Service, all of those concurrent. The alternative sentence which we had in mind would be 9 months' youth detention.

4. C, can I make this absolutely plain, this is your last chance. If you do not carry out the community service exactly as you are told, if you do not turn up when you are told to, if you do not work properly when you are there or if you re-offend, you will brought back and if you are brought back you will go to youth detention. It is your choice. If you carry out this community service and don't re-offend then you won't have to go to youth detention but if you fail to do so, you will go to La Moye. Authorities Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994. Page Last Updated: 16 Mar 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 1994

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.