AG v Caires [2024] JRC 281 (13 December 2024)
- Citation
- [2024] JRC 281
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Exceptional mitigation and delay justified substituting imprisonment with community service and disqualification from driving.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 50 hours' community service for driving with alcohol concentration above prescribed limit
- 18 months' disqualification from driving with requirement to retake test
- 312 hours' community service for causing serious injury by dangerous driving
- 2.5 years' disqualification from driving with requirement to retake test
- 100 hours' community service for failing to stop and report accident
- total of 312 hours' community service with 2.5 years' disqualification from driving dating from 26 September 2024 with requirement to retake test
02
Material facts
Parties
Attorney General
ProsecutorDefendant
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Community Service Hours (count 1): 50
- Imprisonment Equivalent (count 1): month 1
- Driving Disqualification (count 1): months 18
- Community Service Hours (count 2): 312
- Imprisonment Equivalent (count 2): months 24
- Driving Disqualification (count 2): months 30
- Community Service Hours (count 3): 100
- Imprisonment Equivalent (count 3): months 4
- Total Community Service Hours: 312
- Total Driving Disqualification: months 30
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
appropriate sentencing for driving offences
- 02
mitigation in sentencing
- 03
delay as extra punishment
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Crown assessed the appropriate sentence as imprisonment, arguing for a higher custodial sentence.
- Respondent
- Mitigation included clear and genuine remorse, inexcusable delay amounting to extra punishment, and recommendations in the Pre-Sentencing Report.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines - Motoring
Mitigation can justify departure from custodial sentence.
- 02
AG v Wilkinson [2023] JRC 042
Delay may be considered as extra punishment.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Exceptional mitigation and delay justified substituting imprisonment with community service and disqualification from driving.
Obiter and limits
- No recommendation for deportation.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 50 hours' community service for driving with alcohol concentration above prescribed limit
- 18 months' disqualification from driving with requirement to retake test
- 312 hours' community service for causing serious injury by dangerous driving
- 2.5 years' disqualification from driving with requirement to retake test
- 100 hours' community service for failing to stop and report accident
- total of 312 hours' community service with 2.5 years' disqualification from driving dating from 26 September 2024 with requirement to retake test
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. We will give further reasons in writing for our decision in due course. In general, however, we think that the Crown's assessment of the appropriate sentence in terms of imprisonment is somewhat too high and in normal circumstances, a sentence of 2 year's imprisonment would be appropriate.
2. However, we think that the available mitigation which includes very clear and genuine remorse, taken with what we regard as wholly inexcusable delay which we see as a material extra punishment already suffered by this Defendant, together with the clear recommendation in the Pre-Sentencing Report, enables us to take an exceptional course and impose a sentence of community service in this matter.
3. Accordingly, you are sentenced as follows:- (i) Count 1 driving a motor vehicle with alcohol concentration above the prescribed limit, 50 hours' community service, which is the equivalent to 1 month imprisonment to run concurrent together with 18 months' disqualification from driving with the requirement to retake the driving test; (ii) Count 2 causing serious injury by dangerous driving, 312 hours community service, the equivalent of 2 years' imprisonment with a 2½ years' disqualification from driving with the requirement to retake the driving test; and (iii) Count 3 failing to stop and report an accident, 100 hours' community service, the equivalent of 4 months' imprisonment also concurrent making a total of 312 hours of community service with a 2.5 years' disqualification from driving dating from 26 September 2024 with a requirement to retake the test.
4. We make as we already indicated no recommendation for deportation and that concludes the decision of the Court, further reasons will be handed down in due course. Authorities Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 AG v Wilkinson [2023] JRC 042 AG v Arnold [2023] JRC 064 Camacho v AG [2007] JLR 462 Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders)(Jersey) Law 1994 Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines - Motoring AG v Figueira [2007] JRC 136 AG v Cardoso, Santos and Silva [2014] JRC 206 AG v B [2018] JRC 050 AG v Koradi [2014] JRC 073 Page Last Updated: 15 Jan 2025 Back to top About JLIB Accessibility Contacts Copyright Disclaimer Feedback Privacy policy Site map BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.