AG -v- Chapman [2008] JRC 037 (07 March 2008)
- Citation
- [2008] JRC 037
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant knowingly and deliberately breached the Housing (Jersey) Law 1949 by letting only part of the property, submitting misleading information, and attempting to persuade a tenant to lie to the housing department, warranting fines and costs.
Court disposition
conviction and fines imposed
Orders
- Fines of £4000 on each count
- £1500 costs
- 2 months' imprisonment in default for each count
- 3 months to pay the fines
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown Defendant
Defendant Counsel: Advocate BenestHousing Department
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Fine Per Count: GBP 4,000
- Costs: GBP 1,500
- Imprisonment in Default Per Count (months): 2
- Time to Pay Fines (months): 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Deliberate breach of Housing (Jersey) Law 1949
- 02
Misleading housing form submission
- 03
Attempted persuasion to lie to housing department
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Advocate Benest argued that the defendant's initial intention was not to breach the law when the grandson first occupied the property, and highlighted delay and other mitigating factors.
- Respondent
- The prosecution emphasized the defendant's knowing and deliberate breach of the law, misleading conduct, and lack of cooperation with the housing department.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Housing (Jersey) Law 1949
Deliberate breach of statutory housing requirements constitutes a criminal offence.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant knowingly and deliberately breached the Housing (Jersey) Law 1949 by letting only part of the property, submitting misleading information, and attempting to persuade a tenant to lie to the housing department, warranting fines and costs.
Obiter and limits
- The defendant's attitude towards the department showed a lamentable lack of honesty and desire to help.
Court disposition
conviction and fines imposed
- Fines of £4000 on each count
- £1500 costs
- 2 months' imprisonment in default for each count
- 3 months to pay the fines
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. This was a knowing and deliberate breach of the Housing (Jersey) Law 1949 . You were told in 2004 that the property had to be left as a whole to a residentially qualified tenant who could in turn take in and collect the income from up to 5 lodgers. Despite this you knowingly let the ground floor only to Miss Noel, you put in a misleading housing form and, very importantly, you tried to persuade her to lie to the housing department when they started to investigate. When Miss Noel had to go because she was not willing to collect the entire income, after a short period when your husband was there, you repeated your conduct.
2. We accept what Advocate Benest says on your behalf, namely that that may not have been your intention when your grandson first went in there, but the fact remains that almost immediately you reverted to conduct which you knew then, from at least 2 previous occasions, was illegal. Furthermore, when the housing department started to investigate, you were uncooperative, even going to the extent of preventing your grandson from going to talk to them. The gravemen of this offence is that is was a deliberate breach of the law.
3. We take into account your guilty plea and we also take note of the delay and the other matters which Advocate Benest has put forward. The gravemen of this offence was that it was a deliberate breach of the law and also your attitude towards the department shows a lamentable lack of honesty and a desire to help them.
4. We think the fines are entirely justified, so we are going to impose fines of £4000 on each count and £1500 costs and 2 months' in default in relation to each count. You will have 3 months in which to pay the fines. Authorities Housing (Jersey) Law 1949. Page Last Updated: 06 Jun 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.