AG v Cornish [2016] JRC 199C (04 November 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 199C
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Custodial sentence imposed due to repeated and flagrant breaches of court orders, failure to respond to community-based alternatives, and high risk of failure for further community orders.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 7 months' imprisonment for breach of restraining order
- 6 months' imprisonment consecutive for breach of community service order
- total 13 months' imprisonment
02
Material facts
Parties
The Crown
ProsecutorDefendant
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment for Breach of Restraining Order: 7
- Imprisonment for Breach of Community Service Order: 6
- Total Imprisonment: 13
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
breach of restraining order
- 02
breach of community service order
- 03
appropriate sentencing
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Mitigation based on guilty plea and optimism expressed in letter; relationship with victim was volatile and sometimes victim encouraged breach.
- Respondent
- Crown argued for imprisonment due to flagrant breach, prior record, and failure to respond to non-custodial alternatives.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Crime (Disorderly Conduct and Harassment)(Jersey) Law 2008
Flagrant breach of court orders warrants custodial sentence when non-custodial alternatives have failed.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Custodial sentence imposed due to repeated and flagrant breaches of court orders, failure to respond to community-based alternatives, and high risk of failure for further community orders.
Obiter and limits
- Some cause for optimism noted in defendant's letter.
- Mixed messages from victim regarding breaches.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 7 months' imprisonment for breach of restraining order
- 6 months' imprisonment consecutive for breach of community service order
- total 13 months' imprisonment
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced today for the breach of a restraining order made under the Crime (Disorderly Conduct and Harassment)(Jersey) Law 2008 . The offence was committed on the 6 th July and in committing this offence you placed yourself in breach of a Community Service Order. We do not need to go into the full details of the offending. This is a complex matter, and you were in a relationship with the victim and have been in such a relationship since 2008. It has been described in the papers as an on/off relationship and it was clear that it was a volatile one and involved both excessive consumption of alcohol and, as a result, violence from time to time.
2. This is far from being your first breach, but there have been mixed messages. Sometimes you had been encouraged by the victim in your breach and sometimes not. In any event though, although the victim allowed you into her accommodation on this occasion, this was nonetheless a flagrant breach of the order of the Court, and you have a quite dreadful record. There is a whole list of similar type of offending and many examples where you have not responded to all of the non-custodial alternatives that the Court has tried.
3. We note the mitigation in this case, specifically your guilty plea, but it cannot be said that you were co-operative with the police and gave frank admissions, instead you gave a misleading account initially. We note the contents of your letter and we see in it some cause for optimism, but nonetheless it is clear that there is a high risk of failure attendant on any community order that the Court might make. We do not think that it is any longer open to us to make a Community Service Order, or to deal with this other than realistically by a term of imprisonment. This breach, as I have said, is a flagrant one and one of a sequence of many breaches in the past of which you have been given the opportunity to deal with the matter in the community.
4. We think the Crown's conclusions are correct and you are sentenced to 7 months' imprisonment for the current breach and 6 months' imprisonment, consecutive, for breach of the Community Service Order, making a total of 13 months' imprisonment. Authorities Crime (Disorderly Conduct and Harassment)(Jersey) Law 2008. AG-v-Amy [2015] JRC 148 . Page Last Updated: 28 Nov 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.