Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Da Silva [2016] JRC 046 (19 February 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The seriousness of the offence, involving returning armed with a knife and threatening others while intoxicated, outweighs mitigation; 18 months' imprisonment is appropriate. Deportation is not recommended by a narrow margin, but future offences will likely result in such a recommendation.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 18 months' imprisonment
  • forfeiture and destruction of the weapon
  • no recommendation for deportation

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown (Defendant)

Defendant

Attorney General (Crown)

Prosecutor

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment Term (months): 18

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Mitigation includes plea of guilty, good work record, and some remorse.
Respondent
Seriousness aggravated by use of knife, prior conviction for grave and criminal assault, and lack of sufficient remorse.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court practice

    Alcohol as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating one.

  2. 02

    Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462

    Camacho-v-AG test for deportation recommendations.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The seriousness of the offence, involving returning armed with a knife and threatening others while intoxicated, outweighs mitigation; 18 months' imprisonment is appropriate. Deportation is not recommended by a narrow margin, but future offences will likely result in such a recommendation.

Obiter and limits

  • If a similar offence occurs again, deportation will almost inevitably be recommended.
  • The defendant is given one last chance.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • 18 months' imprisonment
  • forfeiture and destruction of the weapon
  • no recommendation for deportation

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2016] JRC 046

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced for a single count of making an affray. It is clear that alcohol has played a significant part and, as is often noted in this Court, that is an aggravating feature and not a mitigating one. But what makes this crime so serious is the fact that you returned home after an argument had started, armed yourself with a knife, returned armed, and then brandished it and threatened people with it. At that point the consequences could have been very severe. You were a drunken person armed with a knife. It must have been a shocking and frightening experience for those who witnessed it.

2. We have given due regard to the mitigation available to you, to your plea of guilty, and your good work record but we are not persuaded that you are as remorseful as might be expected and your record is not a good one. The previous offence of grave and criminal assault was a serious one.

3. We have considered carefully the sentence that we should impose but we believe that the conclusions of the Crown are correct and you are accordingly sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment.

4. We also order the forfeiture and destruction of the weapon.

5. We turn now to the question of deportation. This is the second time that you have been convicted; you have previously been convicted for a grave and criminal assault and this is the second time you have been convicted for an offence of serious potential violence. We are satisfied that the first limb of the Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462 test has been passed and we have thought most anxiously about whether or not we should recommend your deportation from the Island at the conclusion of your sentence. It is by the narrowest of margins that we conclude that we should not, on this occasion, recommend your deportation. Please understand that should anything like this happen again, the Court will almost inevitably consider that you should be subject to a recommendation for deportation. We are giving you one last chance. Authorities Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462 . Whelan on Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Court of Jersey (3 rd Edition). AG v Burrell and others [2003] JLR N 53. AG-v-Burrell and others [2003] JRC 209 . AG v Heard [2012] JRC 132 . AG v De Carvalho and Richomme [2014] JRC 213A . Page Last Updated: 13 Apr 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462

Case cited

AG v Burrell and others [2003] JLR N 53

Case cited

AG-v-Burrell and others [2003] JRC 209

Case cited

AG v Heard [2012] JRC 132

Case cited

AG v De Carvalho and Richomme [2014] JRC 213A

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.