AG -v- Da Silva [2016] JRC 046 (19 February 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 046
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The seriousness of the offence, involving returning armed with a knife and threatening others while intoxicated, outweighs mitigation; 18 months' imprisonment is appropriate. Deportation is not recommended by a narrow margin, but future offences will likely result in such a recommendation.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment
- forfeiture and destruction of the weapon
- no recommendation for deportation
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown (Defendant)
DefendantAttorney General (Crown)
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment Term (months): 18
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Appropriate sentence for affray involving a weapon
- 02
Whether deportation should be recommended
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Mitigation includes plea of guilty, good work record, and some remorse.
- Respondent
- Seriousness aggravated by use of knife, prior conviction for grave and criminal assault, and lack of sufficient remorse.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court practice
Alcohol as an aggravating factor, not a mitigating one.
- 02
Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462
Camacho-v-AG test for deportation recommendations.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The seriousness of the offence, involving returning armed with a knife and threatening others while intoxicated, outweighs mitigation; 18 months' imprisonment is appropriate. Deportation is not recommended by a narrow margin, but future offences will likely result in such a recommendation.
Obiter and limits
- If a similar offence occurs again, deportation will almost inevitably be recommended.
- The defendant is given one last chance.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 18 months' imprisonment
- forfeiture and destruction of the weapon
- no recommendation for deportation
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced for a single count of making an affray. It is clear that alcohol has played a significant part and, as is often noted in this Court, that is an aggravating feature and not a mitigating one. But what makes this crime so serious is the fact that you returned home after an argument had started, armed yourself with a knife, returned armed, and then brandished it and threatened people with it. At that point the consequences could have been very severe. You were a drunken person armed with a knife. It must have been a shocking and frightening experience for those who witnessed it.
2. We have given due regard to the mitigation available to you, to your plea of guilty, and your good work record but we are not persuaded that you are as remorseful as might be expected and your record is not a good one. The previous offence of grave and criminal assault was a serious one.
3. We have considered carefully the sentence that we should impose but we believe that the conclusions of the Crown are correct and you are accordingly sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment.
4. We also order the forfeiture and destruction of the weapon.
5. We turn now to the question of deportation. This is the second time that you have been convicted; you have previously been convicted for a grave and criminal assault and this is the second time you have been convicted for an offence of serious potential violence. We are satisfied that the first limb of the Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462 test has been passed and we have thought most anxiously about whether or not we should recommend your deportation from the Island at the conclusion of your sentence. It is by the narrowest of margins that we conclude that we should not, on this occasion, recommend your deportation. Please understand that should anything like this happen again, the Court will almost inevitably consider that you should be subject to a recommendation for deportation. We are giving you one last chance. Authorities Camacho-v-AG [2007] JLR 462 . Whelan on Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Court of Jersey (3 rd Edition). AG v Burrell and others [2003] JLR N 53. AG-v-Burrell and others [2003] JRC 209 . AG v Heard [2012] JRC 132 . AG v De Carvalho and Richomme [2014] JRC 213A . Page Last Updated: 13 Apr 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.