AG v Dixey and Pereira [2017] JRC 066 (28 April 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 066
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Post Guilty Plea, Bail Application
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Post Guilty Plea, Bail Application
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Bail granted because the Court was not entirely satisfied that exceptional circumstances existed, but the defendants or their counsel may not have been aware of the usual policy, and there was no likely interference with witnesses or flight risk.
Court disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Bail granted to defendants after guilty plea despite likely custodial sentence, due to lack of flight risk or witness interference and possible unawareness of policy.
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown Defendants
Defendant03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Post Guilty Plea, Bail Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether bail should be granted after a guilty plea to an offence likely to result in a custodial sentence
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Defendants seek bail after entering a guilty plea, possibly unaware of the Court's usual policy.
- Respondent
- No explicit respondent argument recorded.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court's statement in judgment
Court's general policy is to remand in custody after a guilty plea to an offence likely to result in a custodial sentence, unless exceptional circumstances exist.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Bail granted because the Court was not entirely satisfied that exceptional circumstances existed, but the defendants or their counsel may not have been aware of the usual policy, and there was no likely interference with witnesses or flight risk.
Obiter and limits
- The landscape changes with a guilty plea and defendants should expect to be remanded in custody if a custodial sentence is likely, unless there are exceptional circumstances.
Court disposition
Bail granted
- Bail granted to defendants after guilty plea despite likely custodial sentence, due to lack of flight risk or witness interference and possible unawareness of policy.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. The Court's general policy, once a guilty plea has been entered on an Indictment containing charges which are likely to result in a custodial sentence, is to have a remand in custody. But we are conscious that in the more recent past that policy may not have been so routinely applied. However, it will be the policy for the future and one would expect exceptional circumstances to be provided if the Court is going to grant bail after a guilty plea to an offence which is likely to carry a custodial sentence.
2. In this particular case we are not entirely satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances but perhaps the defendants or their counsel had not been aware of the usual policy which is to be applied by this Court and really that is the only reason that the Court is prepared to look at the underlying facts. In this case, we are satisfied that there is not likely to be interference of witnesses or flight risk and for those reasons in this particular case we are going to grant bail. That does not mean that the Court will be imposing a non-custodial sentence.
3. But in doing so we just want to be absolutely clear with the profession that the landscape changes with a guilty plea and that defendants should expect to be remanded in custody once the guilty plea has been entered if it is likely that a custodial sentence will be imposed, unless there are exceptional circumstances. No Authorities Page Last Updated: 22 May 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.