AG -v- E [2016] JRC 208 (11 November 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 208
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Immigration / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Immigration / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The commissioner decided to recommend deportation after considering submissions from both counsel.
Court disposition
Deportation recommended
Orders
- Deportation recommended; written judgment to follow
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown Applicant
ApplicantUnknown Respondent
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Immigration / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether deportation is appropriate
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant's counsel made submissions against deportation.
- Respondent
- Respondent's counsel made submissions in favor of deportation.
05
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The commissioner decided to recommend deportation after considering submissions from both counsel.
Court disposition
Deportation recommended
- Deportation recommended; written judgment to follow
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. Having listened to the submissions of both counsel we are going to recommend deportation but we are going to set out our reasons in a written judgment which will be issued shortly. No Authorities Page Last Updated: 24 Nov 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.