Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Faulkner [2011] JRC 046C (28 February 2011)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The seriousness of arson, risk to others, and aggravating factor of turning on gas outweigh emotional mitigation; guilty plea and good character reduce sentence within 3-5 year tariff to 4 years.

Court disposition

convicted

Orders

  • 4 years' imprisonment

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr Faulkner

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Sentence Length: 4

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel presented mitigation including guilty plea, good character, remorse, low risk of re-offending, and references showing offence was out of character.
Respondent
Court emphasized seriousness of arson, risk to nearby occupiers, and aggravating factor of turning on gas; emotional problems not considered substantial mitigation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    AG-v-Dewhurst [2007] JRC 098

    Arson is always a serious offence because of the risk of the fire getting out of control.

  2. 02

    AG-v-Dewhurst [2007] JRC 098

    Unexpected and uncertain consequences because fires can so easily get out of control.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The seriousness of arson, risk to others, and aggravating factor of turning on gas outweigh emotional mitigation; guilty plea and good character reduce sentence within 3-5 year tariff to 4 years.

Court disposition

convicted

  • 4 years' imprisonment

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2011] JRC 046C

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. Mr Faulkner, you are here to be sentenced for one Count of arson and as the Court said in the case of AG-v-Dewhurst [2007] JRC 098 :- "Arson is always a serious offence because of the risk of the fire getting out of control" The court went on to say:- "There are so often unexpected and uncertain consequences because fires can so easily get out of control." Here there was a situation where you set fire to a flat where there were innocent occupiers of flats nearby and of the commercial premises below.

2. The Court treats the turning on of the gas as an aggravating factor and I add that we do not consider the emotional problems which you were suffering at the time to be sufficient or indeed any substantial mitigation.

3. The end point or tariff for offences of this kind is set between 3 and 5 years' imprisonment and having regard to all the circumstances of this case, but in particular we have regard to the many things that were said on your behalf by your counsel and your guilty plea, your good character, we treat you as being of good character, and the references which show that this was indeed out of character as far as you are concerned. We take into account the low risk of re-offending and the remorse which you have expressed. We also take into account the fact that you were expecting to be sentenced on the 28 th January and had an adjournment forced upon you as a result of a listing problem. Taking all these matters of mitigation into account, we sentence you to 4 years' imprisonment. Authorities AG-v-Dewhurst [2007] JRC 098 . AG-v-Coutanche [1989] JLR N 11b. AG-v-Corbel [2010] JRC 151B . Page Last Updated: 18 Aug 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG-v-Dewhurst [2007] JRC 098

Case cited

AG-v-Coutanche [1989] JLR N 11b

Case cited

AG-v-Corbel [2010] JRC 151B

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.