AG -v- Geddes [2011] JRC 097 (13 May 2011)
- Citation
- [2011] JRC 097
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant is sentenced to community service and probation due to factors including time served on remand, youth, remorse, and rehabilitation, avoiding a custodial sentence for a serious street assault.
Court disposition
convicted
Orders
- 240 hours' community service on Count 3
- 18 months' probation
- £200 fine or 4 days' imprisonment in default on Count 4
- One month to pay the fine
02
Material facts
Parties
Defendant
Defendant Counsel: counselAttorney General
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Community Service Hours: 240
- Probation Months: 18
- Fine: GBP 200
- Alternative Imprisonment Days for Fine Default: 4
- Remand Months Served: 5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Appropriate sentence for grave and criminal assault and malicious damage
- 02
Consideration of remand period, youth, remorse, and rehabilitation
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Remorse expressed, youth, constructive use of bail period, family support, job offer.
- Respondent
- Seriousness of assault, lack of provocation, need for severe sentence for street violence.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Magistrate's Court Guidelines
Community service is a deprivation of liberty and not a soft sentence.
- 02
Whelan's Aspects on Sentencing in the Superior Court of Jersey
Court deals severely with street violence, especially at night.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant is sentenced to community service and probation due to factors including time served on remand, youth, remorse, and rehabilitation, avoiding a custodial sentence for a serious street assault.
Obiter and limits
- Community service benefits society and is not a soft sentence.
- If the order is breached, a custodial sentence will be imposed.
Court disposition
convicted
- 240 hours' community service on Count 3
- 18 months' probation
- £200 fine or 4 days' imprisonment in default on Count 4
- One month to pay the fine
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are here to be sentenced on an Indictment which contains two counts, one of grave and criminal assault and the other of malicious damage. The grave and criminal assault charge arises out of an incident at night when you and one of your friends chased the victim from one street to another, set upon him and kicked and punched him while he was on the ground. This was a very serious assault. The Court has said many times that it will deal severely with offences of violence committed on the streets of St Helier, especially when committed at night, which is even more frightening for the victim because there are fewer people on hand to help him; and this was a nasty and a cowardly offence because there were two of you ganging up on one person who tried to get away.
2. There was no provocation as far as the Court can tell on the part of the victim, certainly none that has been identified and there really is no excuse for your behaviour that evening. The offence calls for a severe sentence.
3. In fact we are going to avoid a custodial sentence in your case. Some people who do not know better think that a sentence of community service is some form of let off or a soft sentence. This Court knows that it is not. A sentence of community service deprives offenders of their liberty in their leisure time, but it enables them to work constructively during the working week so that they are not a burden on the public purse. The work that is done benefits charities, community centres, hostels and the elderly in particular, but it is worth emphasising that an Order for community service is a deprivation of liberty during the time that the service is performed.
4. The Court has taken into account the fact that you have served some five months or so on remand between November last year and 25 th March when you were granted conditional bail and notes that that has been a short shock to you. That is very much taken into account as one of the reasons why the Court feels able to avoid a long custodial sentence. We have also taken very much into account your youth and the remorse which is well expressed by your counsel and particularly the fact that you have used your time sensibly since being granted bail and have been offered a job. Indeed, we note the support of your family, and your mother being present in Court today.
5. I want to warn you that if you breach the Order which we are about to impose you will be brought back to this Court and it is the very strong recommendation of this Court that the alternative sentence in custody should then be imposed.
6. Having regard to those factors we sentence you on Count 3 to 240 hours' community service, the alternative would have been a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment and in addition you are put on probation for 18 months. In relation to Count 4 you will be fined £200 or 4 days' imprisonment in default of payment, and we will give you one month in which the pay the fine. Authorities Magistrate's Court Guidelines. Whelan's Aspects on Sentencing in the Superior Court of Jersey. Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111 . AG-v-Hilario [2010] JRC 039 . AG-v- Wakeling and O'Driscoll [1990] JLR N20c. Page Last Updated: 18 Aug 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.