Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Goodchild [2016] JRC 103 (10 June 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Bail was refused because the defendant previously breached bail conditions, and the guilty plea altered the case landscape, making a custodial sentence inevitable.

Court disposition

bail refused; defendant remanded in custody

Orders

  • Bail is refused.
  • Defendant remanded in custody.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr Goodchild

Defendant

The Crown

Prosecution

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Bail Application and Plea Hearing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for Mr Goodchild made a full application for bail.
Respondent
The Crown opposed bail due to previous breach of bail conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's oral reasoning

    The criminal process must be followed fairly by all parties and bail conditions must be respected.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Bail was refused because the defendant previously breached bail conditions, and the guilty plea altered the case landscape, making a custodial sentence inevitable.

Obiter and limits

  • The criminal process does not continue at the defendant's convenience; all parties must ensure justice is done.

Court disposition

bail refused; defendant remanded in custody

  • Bail is refused.
  • Defendant remanded in custody.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2016] JRC 103

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. Mr Goodchild, your counsel has made a very full application for bail but bail is refused. The Court remanded you in custody last week because you had breached the bail condition. As far as this Court is concerned it is important to make it plain to defendants that the criminal process does not continue at their convenience; it continues fairly and all parties, both the Crown and the defendant, are expected to play their part in making sure that justice is done and that the proper process is followed. Your bail was rightly revoked last week.

2. We have read the proposed agreed basis of plea and we have heard the facts as outlined by the Crown. It seems to us that inevitably we should, at this stage, take your guilty plea, even on the proposed basis which has been put forward, as changing the landscape and you are therefore looking at a custodial sentence.

3. Bail is refused. No Authorities Page Last Updated: 16 Aug 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.