Jersey Judgment

AG v Harvey and McLoughlin [2002] JRC 95 (10 May 2002)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Unprovoked violent attacks in public places warrant custodial sentences to deter such conduct, and mitigation factors may reduce but not eliminate the need for imprisonment.

Court disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • Harvey sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment.
  • McLoughlin sentenced to 12 months' youth detention with post-release supervision under Young Offenders Law.

02

Material facts

Parties

Harvey

Accused

McLoughlin

Accused

Crown

Prosecution

Amounts and remedies

  • Harvey Imprisonment Duration: 15
  • Mc Loughlin Youth Detention Duration: 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Mitigation for Harvey includes no previous convictions for violence, early guilty plea, remorse, and community service offer. Mitigation for McLoughlin includes guilty plea and youth, but he is not a first offender.
Respondent
Crown initially considered higher sentences but accepted mitigation presented by defence counsel.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's reasoning

    Custodial sentences are necessary for serious, unprovoked public violence to deter such conduct.

  2. 02

    The Criminal Justice Young Offenders (Jersey) Law

    Article 4 of The Criminal Justice Young Offenders (Jersey) Law restricts youth detention except in serious cases.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Unprovoked violent attacks in public places warrant custodial sentences to deter such conduct, and mitigation factors may reduce but not eliminate the need for imprisonment.

Obiter and limits

  • Alcohol consumption is an aggravating factor in violent offences.
  • The Court will not tolerate violence on the streets of St Helier.

Court disposition

conviction and sentencing

  • Harvey sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment.
  • McLoughlin sentenced to 12 months' youth detention with post-release supervision under Young Offenders Law.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2002] JRC 95

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. The Court wishes to state at the outset that violence of this kind on the streets of St Helier is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated by the Court. This incident took place at about 8.20 p.m. on a main street in the centre of the town, at a time when families with children might well be expected to be present. It was no doubt fuelled by the alcohol that the accused had drunk during the day and that is another aggravating factor. We have had the opportunity of viewing the incident on the video tape on which it was recorded. It is clear that the second part of the attack on the doorman in which both the accused were involved was completely unprovoked. Furthermore, it followed more than 4 minutes after the first incident and the ejection of the accused from the public house, during which there was some opportunity for tempers to cool.

2. There is of course mitigation available to both accused. So far as Harvey is concerned he has no previous convictions for violence and he pleaded guilty at an early stage to the offence. We accept that he has shown remorse and that he has shown a wider responsibility to the community by offering to share his skills as a footballer with children under the auspices of the Jersey Child Care Trust.

3. So far as McLoughlin is concerned, he is not a first offender in terms of violence, but nonetheless he has pleaded guilty to the indictment. He is younger than his co-accused, and we have regard to the terms of Article 4 of The Criminal Justice Young Offenders (Jersey) Law , which prevents the Court from imposing a sentence of youth detention other than in certain circumstances. We have reached the conclusion, however, that no other method of dealing with McLoughlin is appropriate in this case, because the offence is so serious that a non-custodial sentence cannot be justified.

4. We had initially been considering increasing the conclusions of the Crown, but having regard to the mitigation outlined very ably by counsel for the defence, we think that the conclusions are in fact correct. We cannot avoid imposing custodial sentences in order to send out a clear message that unprovoked attacks of this kind in a public place will be punished by the deprivation of liberty.

5. Harvey you are accordingly sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment. McLoughlin you are sentenced to 12 months' youth detention, and I have to tell you that on your release from youth detention you will be liable to supervision by a Probation Officer or other official in accordance with the Young Offenders Law. Authorities A. G.-v- Mallett (24 th May, 2000) Jersey Unreported [2000/87]. A. G.-v-de Freitas (20 th April, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/86B]. A. G.-v- Porteous (15 th June, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/138]. A. G.-v- Bonhomme (16 th July, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/146]. A. G.-v-Blackley (23June, 2000) Jersey Unreported [2000/114]. Page Last Updated: 21 Jun 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

A. G.-v-Mallett (24 May, 2000) Jersey Unreported [2000/87]

Case cited

A. G.-v-de Freitas (20 April, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/86B]

Case cited

A. G.-v-Porteous (15 June, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/138]

Case cited

A. G.-v-Bonhomme (16 July, 2001) Jersey Unreported [2001/146]

Case cited

A. G.-v-Blackley (23 June, 2000) Jersey Unreported [2000/114]

Case cited

The Criminal Justice Young Offenders (Jersey) Law

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.