Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Howard [2015] JRC 074 (17 April 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Despite the seriousness of the offences and aggravating factor of intoxication, the court departed from the usual custodial sentence due to the defendant's remorse, guilty plea, and evidence of insight and rehabilitation, imposing a community service order, probation, and treatment order as a final opportunity.

Court disposition

non-custodial sentence imposed

Orders

  • 180 hours' Community Service Order (equivalent to 12 months' imprisonment)
  • 12 month Probation Order
  • 12 month Treatment Order with mandatory attendance at Alcohol and Drug Service, abstention from illegal/non-prescribed substances, and compliance with treatment goals
  • 50 hours' Community Service for malicious damage (concurrent)

02

Material facts

Parties

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Unnamed Defendant

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Community Service Order (main Offences): 180
  • Community Service Order (malicious Damage): 50
  • Probation Order Duration (months): 12
  • Treatment Order Duration (months): 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Crown referred to AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JLR N22b, identifying a focal point of 18 months' imprisonment for these offences, and argued for a custodial sentence.
Respondent
The defendant pleaded guilty, expressed remorse, and submitted evidence of insight into the link between alcohol abuse and offending, seeking leniency and a non-custodial sentence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General sentencing principles

    Intoxication is not a mitigating factor; it is an aggravating factor in sentencing.

  2. 02

    AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JLR N22b

    Focal point of 18 months' imprisonment for commercial breaking and entering at night.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Despite the seriousness of the offences and aggravating factor of intoxication, the court departed from the usual custodial sentence due to the defendant's remorse, guilty plea, and evidence of insight and rehabilitation, imposing a community service order, probation, and treatment order as a final opportunity.

Obiter and limits

  • This is positively the last chance for the defendant; any breach or reoffending will likely result in imprisonment.
  • The court has taken a high-risk strategy in favour of rehabilitation based on current reports.

Court disposition

non-custodial sentence imposed

  • 180 hours' Community Service Order (equivalent to 12 months' imprisonment)
  • 12 month Probation Order
  • 12 month Treatment Order with mandatory attendance at Alcohol and Drug Service, abstention from illegal/non-prescribed substances, and compliance with treatment goals
  • 50 hours' Community Service for malicious damage (concurrent)

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2015] JRC 074

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You have pleaded guilty to three charges, namely breaking and entering and larceny, attempted larceny and malicious damage and all of these offences took place as part of the same incident and whilst you were under the influence of substantial amounts of alcohol. The premises that you entered were commercial, a local hotel, and during the course of the incident, you pushed the night porter who came to investigate, off-balance. This demonstrates the risk of confrontation that is almost always present in cases of breaking and entering.

2. You do not have a good record and clearly you have struggled with your inappropriate use of alcohol, and there was no excuse for these offences and were clearly caused by the excess alcohol you had consumed earlier in that evening. As I am sure you are aware, intoxication is not a mitigating factor, it is an aggravating factor. You have pleaded guilty and your letter is indicative of remorse, which we accept. Breaking and entering and larceny from commercial premises at night puts you squarely in the area of the case of AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JLR N22b to which the Crown has referred, and in which a focal point of 18 months for these types of offences is identified. But we have given very careful consideration to the real prospect that you have now seen the error of your ways. We detect the signs that you seem to be gaining an insight into your relationship with offending and with alcohol and the link between them.

3. Accordingly, we feel able to depart from the conclusions of the Crown and, to mark our view of the seriousness, you will complete a Community Service Order of 180 hours', which is the equivalent to a sentence of 12 months' imprisonment. In addition we impose a Probation Order on you for a period of 12 months coupled with a Treatment Order, meaning that you must attend the Alcohol and Drug Service for a period of 12 months, that you must abstain from illegal and non-prescribed substances, which will be confirmed as necessary with random and routine testing, and that you comply with the treatment goals agreed with the Alcohol and Drug Service. To the malicious damage charge we sentence you to 50 hours' Community Service, equivalent to 1 month's imprisonment, concurrent, making a total sentence of 180 hours' Community Service Order together with a 12 month Probation and Treatment Order.

4. You must understand this Court has been invited to take what might be characterised as a high-risk strategy and has agreed, on this occasion, to do so. We are impressed by the reports and the possibility that you have seriously changed your attitude but this is positively the last chance. If you breach this order you will inevitably be back before the Court and you will inevitably face the very real prospect of a significant period in prison. If you offend again in the future, it will be very hard indeed for the Court to approach the matter in this way again. Take this opportunity, it is your last. Authorities AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JLR N 22b. Archbold:-Pleading, Evidence and Practice in Criminal Cases, 36th Edition. Whelan on Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey, 3rd Edition. AG v Howard [2014] JRC 102C. AG v Howard [2014] JRC 193 . Page Last Updated: 24 Jan 2018 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JLR N22b

Case cited

AG v Howard [2014] JRC 102C

Case cited

AG v Howard [2014] JRC 193

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.