AG -v- Lochhead [2017] JRC 214 (15 December 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] JRC 214
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Trial
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Trial
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant's repeated indecent exposure offences, aggravating factors, and high risk of recidivism warrant a significant custodial sentence and restraining orders.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment
- restraining orders for 5 years
- reporting restrictions for 5 years
02
Material facts
Parties
Crown
ProsecutorDefendant
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment Duration: 18
- Restraining Order Duration: 5
- Reporting Restriction Duration: 5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Trial
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
appropriate sentence for repeat indecent exposure
- 02
imposition of restraining orders
- 03
application of reporting restrictions
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The defendant denied the offence and argued he was required to plead not guilty, suggesting he could have pleaded guilty on certain terms.
- Respondent
- The Crown highlighted aggravating factors including previous convictions, breach of restraining orders, proximity to children's play area, and impact on young victims.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sentencing Guidelines Council's Definitive Guidelines for Sexual Offences Act 2003
Sentencing for repeat sexual offences must protect young people and reflect seriousness of conduct.
- 02
Sexual Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
Reporting restrictions and restraining orders may be imposed for public protection.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant's repeated indecent exposure offences, aggravating factors, and high risk of recidivism warrant a significant custodial sentence and restraining orders.
Obiter and limits
- Expressions of remorse are limited due to lack of immediate acceptance of culpability.
- Without previous convictions, the matter would likely have been dealt with by the Magistrate's Court.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 18 months' imprisonment
- restraining orders for 5 years
- reporting restrictions for 5 years
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You have been referred to this Court for sentence following a finding of guilt after a trial by the Magistrate's Court on one count of indecent exposure. You have been referred to us because you have previous convictions for this offence, one in 2016 and the other in 2015. You have a number of previous convictions for other similar offences.
2. The facts have been explained by the Crown. You exposed yourself to three 15 year old girls at the children's playground at People's Park.
3. We agree with the Crown's suggestion as to the aggravating factors in this matter, specifically that your record of relevant previous convictions is a poor one; that you committed the offence in close proximity to a children's play area, that you are in breach of Restraining Orders imposed by the Court, and all four complainants were 15 year olds. One of them had also been a complainant in your 2015 offending.
4. You denied the offence and the matter went to trial. This, of course, meant that the girls, then witnesses, were subject to cross-examination and the stress of a trial. You do not have therefore the benefit of a guilty plea. We do not accept that you were required to plead not guilty in the way that has been suggested to us because you could have pleaded guilty on certain terms and if the Crown had not accepted those terms, then it would have been a matter for the Crown whether it wished to have the matter determined by way of a Newton Hearing.
5. The social enquiry report identifies the trend in your sexually-motivated offending, this being the thirteenth offence of this nature, and you are described as posing a very high risk of sexual recidivism. You did not accept your culpability immediately and therefore we must view your expressions of remorse in that context. We do not see a great deal by way of personal mitigation available to you.
6. Dealing with the Sexual Offences Law part of this matter we agree that it should be 5 years from today's date before you can apply to have the reporting restrictions lifted in your case and we grant the restraining orders sought by the Crown with the addition of that as set out in paragraph 5 of the conclusions relating to proximity of children's play areas and that also for a period of 5 years from today's date.
7. We turn now to the question of sentence. We are dealing here with a single count of indecent exposure which did not involve masturbation and we accept that but for your previous convictions you would almost certainly have been dealt with by the Magistrate's Court. But you do have previous convictions and those previous convictions are in some cases very recent indeed. We have a duty to protect young people from this kind of traumatic behaviour. We accordingly view this offending as serious and we think it must be met with a significant custodial sentence.
8. We do however think that the period of 2 years moved for by the Crown is too long and you are sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment. Authorities Sexual Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010. AG-v-Lochhead [2015] JRC 168 . AG-v-Lochhead [2014] JRC 093 . R v Pedley [2000] WL 1629537. R v Cosco [2005] EWCA Crim 207. R v Smith and Ors [2012] 1 Cr App R (S) 82 . Sentencing Guidelines Council's Definitive Guidelines for Sexual Offences Act 2003. Page Last Updated: 18 Jan 2018 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.