Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Logan [2015] JRC 113 (27 May 2015)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the quantity and value of cannabis imported, and the defendant's high risk of reoffending, a custodial sentence of 7 years is appropriate, with forfeiture and destruction of the drugs ordered.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 7 years imprisonment
  • forfeiture and destruction of drugs

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown Defendant

Defendant Counsel: defence counsel

Attorney General

Prosecutor Counsel: Crown counsel

Amounts and remedies

  • Cannabis Resin Weight: 33.402
  • Wholesale Value: GBP 40,000
  • Street Value Lower Estimate: GBP 500,000
  • Street Value Upper Estimate: GBP 660,000
  • Sentence Length: 7

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel argued for mitigation based on previous convictions being dated, financial penalty previously imposed, and consideration of guilty plea.
Respondent
Crown argued for a starting point of 10 years imprisonment based on quantity and value of drugs, referencing guideline cases.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136

    Sentencing for importation of controlled drugs should reflect quantity and value, with reference to guideline cases.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the quantity and value of cannabis imported, and the defendant's high risk of reoffending, a custodial sentence of 7 years is appropriate, with forfeiture and destruction of the drugs ordered.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • 7 years imprisonment
  • forfeiture and destruction of drugs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2015] JRC 113

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced today in respect of one count of being concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug, namely 340 bars of cannabis resin with a total weight of 33.402 kg and a wholesale value of approximately £40,000 and a Jersey street value of between £500,000 and £660,000. That cannabis was discovered hidden in a Mazda motor vehicle which you were driving when you disembarked from Weymouth on 6 th February of this year. The cannabis was hidden in the spare wheel, behind the door trims, and in other places throughout the vehicle.

2. Although the evidence was strong you continued, in interview, to deny any knowledge of the hidden cannabis. You have previous convictions for drugs, although we note that these were some 14 years ago and dealt with by way of a financial penalty. You are assessed as a high risk of reoffending, particularly in connection with drugs offences and we note that there is no clear indication of remorse. Your motivation for the importation appears to be nothing more than financial reward. You have, of course, pleaded guilty but you will appreciate that the evidence against you was very strong indeed and you did not do so at the earliest opportunity. However, you are entitled to an appropriate amount of discount to reflect your guilty plea.

3. We have regard to the guideline case of Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136 and the other cases put before us as examples by the Crown. In our view the starting point for this offences, as indeed your counsel agrees, given the quantity of drugs and the value, is as the Crown suggests, one of 10 years.

4. We have considered with great care all that your counsel has said on your behalf and all of the papers before the Court but we consider that the Crown's conclusions are nonetheless entirely correct.

5. The sentence of this Court is that you will go to prison for 7 years.

6. We also order the forfeiture and destruction of the drugs. Authorities Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136 . AG-v-Dicker and Ors 1998/216. AG-v-Travis and Others 2000/80. AG-v-O'Connor and Others [2006] JRC 194. AG-v-Brown [2008] JRC 208 . AG-v-Allman-Jones [2010] JRC 230A . Page Last Updated: 24 Jan 2018 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136

Case cited

AG-v-Dicker and Ors 1998/216

Case cited

AG-v-Travis and Others 2000/80

Case cited

AG-v-O'Connor and Others [2006] JRC 194

Case cited

AG-v-Brown [2008] JRC 208

Case cited

AG-v-Allman-Jones [2010] JRC 230A

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.