AG -v- Logan [2015] JRC 113 (27 May 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 113
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Given the quantity and value of cannabis imported, and the defendant's high risk of reoffending, a custodial sentence of 7 years is appropriate, with forfeiture and destruction of the drugs ordered.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 7 years imprisonment
- forfeiture and destruction of drugs
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown Defendant
Defendant Counsel: defence counselAttorney General
Prosecutor Counsel: Crown counselAmounts and remedies
- Cannabis Resin Weight: 33.402
- Wholesale Value: GBP 40,000
- Street Value Lower Estimate: GBP 500,000
- Street Value Upper Estimate: GBP 660,000
- Sentence Length: 7
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
fraudulent evasion of prohibition on importation of controlled drugs
- 02
appropriate sentencing for drug importation
- 03
forfeiture of controlled substances
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Counsel argued for mitigation based on previous convictions being dated, financial penalty previously imposed, and consideration of guilty plea.
- Respondent
- Crown argued for a starting point of 10 years imprisonment based on quantity and value of drugs, referencing guideline cases.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136
Sentencing for importation of controlled drugs should reflect quantity and value, with reference to guideline cases.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Given the quantity and value of cannabis imported, and the defendant's high risk of reoffending, a custodial sentence of 7 years is appropriate, with forfeiture and destruction of the drugs ordered.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 7 years imprisonment
- forfeiture and destruction of drugs
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. You are to be sentenced today in respect of one count of being concerned in the fraudulent evasion of the prohibition on the importation of a controlled drug, namely 340 bars of cannabis resin with a total weight of 33.402 kg and a wholesale value of approximately £40,000 and a Jersey street value of between £500,000 and £660,000. That cannabis was discovered hidden in a Mazda motor vehicle which you were driving when you disembarked from Weymouth on 6 th February of this year. The cannabis was hidden in the spare wheel, behind the door trims, and in other places throughout the vehicle.
2. Although the evidence was strong you continued, in interview, to deny any knowledge of the hidden cannabis. You have previous convictions for drugs, although we note that these were some 14 years ago and dealt with by way of a financial penalty. You are assessed as a high risk of reoffending, particularly in connection with drugs offences and we note that there is no clear indication of remorse. Your motivation for the importation appears to be nothing more than financial reward. You have, of course, pleaded guilty but you will appreciate that the evidence against you was very strong indeed and you did not do so at the earliest opportunity. However, you are entitled to an appropriate amount of discount to reflect your guilty plea.
3. We have regard to the guideline case of Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136 and the other cases put before us as examples by the Crown. In our view the starting point for this offences, as indeed your counsel agrees, given the quantity of drugs and the value, is as the Crown suggests, one of 10 years.
4. We have considered with great care all that your counsel has said on your behalf and all of the papers before the Court but we consider that the Crown's conclusions are nonetheless entirely correct.
5. The sentence of this Court is that you will go to prison for 7 years.
6. We also order the forfeiture and destruction of the drugs. Authorities Campbell Molloy and Mackenzie-v-AG [1995] JLR 136 . AG-v-Dicker and Ors 1998/216. AG-v-Travis and Others 2000/80. AG-v-O'Connor and Others [2006] JRC 194. AG-v-Brown [2008] JRC 208 . AG-v-Allman-Jones [2010] JRC 230A . Page Last Updated: 24 Jan 2018 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.