Jersey Judgment

AG v Maltez [2000] JRC 158 (04 August 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The likelihood of the applicant absconding is not so great as to justify denying bail, given his circumstances and the conditions imposed.

Court disposition

Bail granted with conditions

Orders

  • Applicant to appear for trial on 4th September, 2000 or as ordered
  • Identity card to remain in police custody
  • Applicant to report twice weekly to police
  • Applicant to reside at 70 New Street, St. Helier and notify police of any change of address

02

Material facts

Parties

Applicant

Applicant Counsel: Counsel for the applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Bail Application / Pre Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending trial for a serious assault charge

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant has no previous convictions, speaks little English, his identity card is held by police, and arrangements for accommodation and employment have been made.
Respondent
Not explicitly stated.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Fundamental principle of criminal law

    A person is presumed innocent until proved guilty.

  2. 02

    Loi (1864) réglant la procédure criminelle: Article 22

    Bail may be refused if there is a significant risk of absconding.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The likelihood of the applicant absconding is not so great as to justify denying bail, given his circumstances and the conditions imposed.

Obiter and limits

  • The Court expresses concern at the length of time accused persons are held in custody pending trial.

Court disposition

Bail granted with conditions

  • Applicant to appear for trial on 4th September, 2000 or as ordered
  • Identity card to remain in police custody
  • Applicant to report twice weekly to police
  • Applicant to reside at 70 New Street, St. Helier and notify police of any change of address

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JRC 158

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. This applicant has pleaded not guilty to committing a grave and criminal assault upon a young woman in circumstances which we accept are serious. The applicant, however, has been in custody now for some 8 months, and we again express our concern at the length of time during which accused persons are being held in custody pending trial. The fundamental principle of the criminal law is that a person is presumed innocent until he is proved guilty.

2. Given that there is a not guilty plea to this charge the Court has to ask itself in these circumstances whether there is a risk if it were to grant bail that the accused will abscond and fail to appear to stand his trial.

3. The Counsel for the applicant has told us that his identity card is in the custody of the police and that he speaks very little English. Arrangements have been made to offer him accommodation and employment at premises in St. Helier. He is a young man with no previous convictions. We have reached the conclusion that the likelihood of his absconding from the Island is not so great that we should deny the applicant his freedom pending his trial on the offence to which he has pleaded not guilty.

4. The order of the Court accordingly is that the applicant will be released upon his undertaking to appear to stand his trial on 4 th September, 2000, or such other date as may be ordered, and that there be the following conditions: First, his identity card will continue to be held in the custody of the police; secondly, he will report twice weekly to the police; and thirdly, he will reside at No. 70 New Street, St. Helier and will notify the police of any change of address. Authorities Loi (1864) réglant la procédure criminelle: Article 22. A. G. -v- Hakes (18 th November, 1994) Jersey Unreported. A. G. -v- Mahé & Ors. (27 th June, 2000) Jersey Unreported. A. G. -v- Bardwell (24 th April, 1996) Jersey Unreported. Page Last Updated: 19 Aug 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

A. G. -v- Hakes (18th November, 1994) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

A. G. -v- Mahé & Ors. (27th June, 2000) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

A. G. -v- Bardwell (24th April, 1996) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

Loi (1864) réglant la procédure criminelle: Article 22

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.