Jersey Judgment

AG v Marquis [2023] JRC 181 (06 October 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Mitigating material warranted a small reduction in the sentences moved for by the Crown; reporting requirements and restrictions under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 to remain for five years; forfeiture and destruction of computers ordered; costs to be paid at £100 per month as requested by defence.

Court disposition

conviction and sentencing

Orders

  • Reporting requirements and restrictions under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 to remain for five years.
  • Forfeiture and destruction of two computers.
  • Costs order: payment at £100 per month.
  • Sentences: Count 1 - 21 months' imprisonment; Count 2 - 12 months' imprisonment; Count 3 - 4 months' imprisonment; Count 4 - 6 months' imprisonment; all to be served concurrently.

02

Material facts

Parties

Attorney General

Prosecutor Counsel: Crown

Defendant

Defendant Counsel: Defence

Amounts and remedies

  • Monthly Costs Payment: GBP 100
  • Sentence Count 1: months 21
  • Sentence Count 2: months 12
  • Sentence Count 3: months 4
  • Sentence Count 4: months 6
  • Total Concurrent Sentence: months 21
  • Sex Offender Registration Duration: years 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Defence requested payment of costs at £100 per month and sought reduction in sentence based on additional mitigation.
Respondent
Crown moved for specific sentencing conclusions, forfeiture, destruction of computers, and reporting requirements under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010

    Reporting requirements and restrictions under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 must remain for five years.

  2. 02

    Protection of Children (Jersey) Law 1994

    Forfeiture and destruction of instrumentalities used in commission of offence.

  3. 03

    National Police Chiefs' Council Sentencing Levels Guidance

    Sentencing levels guidance for sex offences.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Mitigating material warranted a small reduction in the sentences moved for by the Crown; reporting requirements and restrictions under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 to remain for five years; forfeiture and destruction of computers ordered; costs to be paid at £100 per month as requested by defence.

Obiter and limits

  • Defence is expected to upload any material substantially impacting Attorney General's conclusions as soon as available.
  • Concern expressed regarding late upload of forensic therapy progress report.

Court disposition

conviction and sentencing

  • Reporting requirements and restrictions under Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 to remain for five years.
  • Forfeiture and destruction of two computers.
  • Costs order: payment at £100 per month.
  • Sentences: Count 1 - 21 months' imprisonment; Count 2 - 12 months' imprisonment; Count 3 - 4 months' imprisonment; Count 4 - 6 months' imprisonment; all to be served concurrently.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2023] JRC 181

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. We will give fuller reasons for the decision we have made in due course. We express concern that the forensic therapy progress report appears to have been prepared in March of this year but only uploaded to the CaseLines bundle on 2 October 2023, and that is a matter of concern to us because of course it means that the relevant mitigating material, if such it be, could not have been taken into account by the Attorney General, and that is no criticism at all of the Crown.

2. That being said, dealing first with the applications under the Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010 we take the view that it is appropriate that that restriction remain in place for five years as indeed the reporting requirements, so we impose the restraints in the terms set out in the Crown's conclusions for a period of 5 years and we order that 5 years is the period that must elapse before an application can be made to come off the Register.

3. We also order the forfeiture and destruction of the instrumentalities specifically the two computers that are set out in the statement of facts and conclusions, and lastly, we impose the order of costs sought by the Crown, in terms of preliminary matters, that is, with a payment at £100 per month as requested by the defence which was not subject to any objection by the Crown.

4. Turning to the substantive disposal of the matter, we think in the light of the additional mitigation available we should reduce to a small extent the conclusions moved for by the Crown. (i) Count 1, you are sentenced to 21 months' imprisonment. (ii) Count 2, one year imprisonment. (iii) Count 3, four months' imprisonment. (iv) Count 4, six months' imprisonment. (v) All to be served concurrently, making a total of 21 months' imprisonment. (vi) The starting point with regard to Count 1 we accept as being correctly stated at 3 years' imprisonment.

5. In the future, the defence is expected to upload anything which will substantially impact upon the conclusions of the Attorney General, (which they would take the view might substantially impact) as soon as it is available. Authorities Protection of Children (Jersey) Law 1994. Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010. National Police Chiefs' Council Sentencing Levels Guidance. AG v Berry [2019] JRC 053. AG v Nursaw [2019] JRC 186A. AG v Godson and Crowley [2013] JRC 091 . R. v Smith and Ors [2012] 1 Cr App R (S) 82 . AG v Salsac [2017] JRC 125 . AG v Matthews [2020] JRC 186A. R v Smith and Ors [2012] 1 Cr App R (S) 82 . Page Last Updated: 17 Nov 2023 Back to top About JLIB Accessibility Contacts Disclaimer Feedback Privacy policy Site map © Jersey Legal Information Board 2001- This website is not compatible with your web browser. You should install a newer browser . If you live in Jersey and need help upgrading call the States of Jersey web team on 440099. BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG v Berry [2019] JRC 053

Case cited

AG v Nursaw [2019] JRC 186A

Case cited

AG v Godson and Crowley [2013] JRC 091

Case cited

R. v Smith and Ors [2012] 1 Cr App R (S) 82

Case cited

AG v Salsac [2017] JRC 125

Case cited

AG v Matthews [2020] JRC 186A

Case cited

Protection of Children (Jersey) Law 1994

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Sex Offences (Jersey) Law 2010

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.