Jersey Judgment

AG v McCormick [2001] JRC 64 (16 March 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Imprisonment is warranted due to seriousness and aggravating circumstances, but mitigation justifies a slight reduction in sentence.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Count 1: 6 months' imprisonment
  • Count 2: 6 months' imprisonment concurrent
  • Count 3: 12 months' imprisonment consecutive
  • Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment concurrent to Count 3
  • Total: 18 months' imprisonment

02

Material facts

Parties

McCormick

Defendant Counsel: Mr Pirie

Amounts and remedies

  • Total Imprisonment: 18

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Mr Pirie urged mitigation based on guilty plea, difficult background, attempts to change, and negative influence of old friends.
Respondent
Crown's conclusions on sentencing were not challenged; emphasis on seriousness and aggravating factors.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (96-97 Noter-up): pp.25-6

    Sentencing must reflect seriousness and aggravating factors, but credit may be given for mitigation.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Imprisonment is warranted due to seriousness and aggravating circumstances, but mitigation justifies a slight reduction in sentence.

Obiter and limits

  • There was nothing wrong with the Crown's conclusions.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • Count 1: 6 months' imprisonment
  • Count 2: 6 months' imprisonment concurrent
  • Count 3: 12 months' imprisonment consecutive
  • Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment concurrent to Count 3
  • Total: 18 months' imprisonment

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2001] JRC 64

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. This was a reckless incident McCormick in which you showed complete disregard for the property of others, and caused considerable damage. It is aggravated by the fact that whilst on bail you broke your curfew and broke into one set of commercial premises, and attempted to break into another. You then absconded to Scotland and you have previous convictions for dishonesty.

2. Mr Pirie, however, has urged a number of matters in mitigation. He has referred to the plea of guilty, to the contents of the social enquiry report, which show your very difficult background. He has also referred to your attempts to change your ways by coming to Jersey and the fact that that was going well until some old friends came down here and you fell under their bad influence.

3. We have considered all that he has said very carefully, but we have concluded that in the light of all the circumstances and the seriousness of the offences we can only proceed by way of imprisonment. However, we wish to give credit for the efforts you have made to change your ways and we are therefore going to reduce the overall conclusions slightly. We think the most convenient way to do that is to reduce the sentence on counts 1 and 2, although we emphasis that there was nothing wrong with the Crown's conclusions.

4. So the sentence will be on Count 1: 6 month's imprisonment. Count 2: 6 month's imprisonment, concurrent. Count 3: 12 month's imprisonment consecutive, and Count 4: 12 month's imprisonment concurrent to Count 3, making a total of 18 month's imprisonment. Authorities. A. G -v- Wakeling & Driscoll ( 23 rd April, 1990) Jersey Unreported. A. G -v- Ferguson & Graham (8 th December, 1994) Jersey Unreported. Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (96-97 Noter-up): pp.25-6. A. G -v- Gaffney (5 th June, 1995) Jersey Unreported. Page Last Updated: 11 Apr 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

A. G -v- Wakeling & Driscoll (23rd April, 1990) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

A. G -v- Ferguson & Graham (8th December, 1994) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

A. G -v- Gaffney (5th June, 1995) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.