AG v McCormick [2001] JRC 64 (16 March 2001)
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 64
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Imprisonment is warranted due to seriousness and aggravating circumstances, but mitigation justifies a slight reduction in sentence.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Count 1: 6 months' imprisonment
- Count 2: 6 months' imprisonment concurrent
- Count 3: 12 months' imprisonment consecutive
- Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment concurrent to Count 3
- Total: 18 months' imprisonment
02
Material facts
Parties
McCormick
Defendant Counsel: Mr PirieAmounts and remedies
- Total Imprisonment: 18
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
appropriate sentence for burglary and curfew breach
- 02
consideration of mitigation factors
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Mr Pirie urged mitigation based on guilty plea, difficult background, attempts to change, and negative influence of old friends.
- Respondent
- Crown's conclusions on sentencing were not challenged; emphasis on seriousness and aggravating factors.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (96-97 Noter-up): pp.25-6
Sentencing must reflect seriousness and aggravating factors, but credit may be given for mitigation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Imprisonment is warranted due to seriousness and aggravating circumstances, but mitigation justifies a slight reduction in sentence.
Obiter and limits
- There was nothing wrong with the Crown's conclusions.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- Count 1: 6 months' imprisonment
- Count 2: 6 months' imprisonment concurrent
- Count 3: 12 months' imprisonment consecutive
- Count 4: 12 months' imprisonment concurrent to Count 3
- Total: 18 months' imprisonment
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. This was a reckless incident McCormick in which you showed complete disregard for the property of others, and caused considerable damage. It is aggravated by the fact that whilst on bail you broke your curfew and broke into one set of commercial premises, and attempted to break into another. You then absconded to Scotland and you have previous convictions for dishonesty.
2. Mr Pirie, however, has urged a number of matters in mitigation. He has referred to the plea of guilty, to the contents of the social enquiry report, which show your very difficult background. He has also referred to your attempts to change your ways by coming to Jersey and the fact that that was going well until some old friends came down here and you fell under their bad influence.
3. We have considered all that he has said very carefully, but we have concluded that in the light of all the circumstances and the seriousness of the offences we can only proceed by way of imprisonment. However, we wish to give credit for the efforts you have made to change your ways and we are therefore going to reduce the overall conclusions slightly. We think the most convenient way to do that is to reduce the sentence on counts 1 and 2, although we emphasis that there was nothing wrong with the Crown's conclusions.
4. So the sentence will be on Count 1: 6 month's imprisonment. Count 2: 6 month's imprisonment, concurrent. Count 3: 12 month's imprisonment consecutive, and Count 4: 12 month's imprisonment concurrent to Count 3, making a total of 18 month's imprisonment. Authorities. A. G -v- Wakeling & Driscoll ( 23 rd April, 1990) Jersey Unreported. A. G -v- Ferguson & Graham (8 th December, 1994) Jersey Unreported. Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (96-97 Noter-up): pp.25-6. A. G -v- Gaffney (5 th June, 1995) Jersey Unreported. Page Last Updated: 11 Apr 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.