Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Miller [2014] JRC 188A (01 October 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Miss Miller's reason for non-attendance—a forgotten summons due to a surprise holiday—does not constitute a legitimate excuse under the law, and therefore a penalty is appropriate.

Court disposition

fine imposed

Orders

  • Miss Miller to pay a fine of £100 within 7 days

02

Material facts

Parties

Miss Miller

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine: GBP 100

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Contempt (jury Service Non Attendance) / Penalty Determination After Failure to Attend Jury Service

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Miss Miller apologised and explained her partner arranged a surprise holiday to Turkey on 16th September and the summons for jury service slipped her mind.
Respondent
Not applicable; the court considered the statutory requirements and Miss Miller's explanation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 57, Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle

    Every juror duly summoned must attend unless a legitimate excuse is provided, as per Article 57 of the Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle.

  2. 02

    Article 62, Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle

    Grounds for absence are strictly limited to illness or recent death of close relatives, as per Article 62.

  3. 03

    Article 65, Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle

    Remission of penalty may be granted if absence is satisfactorily explained to the court, especially if the ground arises immediately before or on the day of attendance.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Miss Miller's reason for non-attendance—a forgotten summons due to a surprise holiday—does not constitute a legitimate excuse under the law, and therefore a penalty is appropriate.

Obiter and limits

  • Trial by jury is fundamental to the criminal justice system and depends on public participation.
  • The Viscount's officer is reasonable in considering written applications for exemption, but such applications must be made in writing.

Court disposition

fine imposed

  • Miss Miller to pay a fine of £100 within 7 days

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2014] JRC 188A

JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. Miss Miller has been brought before the Court to explain her failure to attend for Jury service on 18 th September, 2014. She was served with the summons in due form personally on 16 th August, 2014, and that summons had attached to it guidelines which included an explanation of how she could apply for exemption.

2. Article 57 of the Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle provides (in translation) as follows:- "Every juror duly summoned to appear at an Assize who, without a legitimate excuse, fails to appear when his name is called, or who, having appeared, withdraws without the leave of the President of the Court, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds." 3. Article 62 sets out the grounds justifying absence namely:- "1 Illness which prevents him from attending Court; The death of a blood relation or relation by marriage up to and including the degrees of brother or sister, provided that the burial did not take place more than eight days before the day on which the juror was required to attend; and in the event of the death of an uncle or aunt, nephew or niece, provided that the burial did not take place before the day on which the juror was required to attend. The following grounds shall be sufficient to justify the absence of a witness or informant who was duly summoned in pursuance of this law - Illness which prevents him from attending Court; The death of a blood relation or relation by marriage up to and including the degrees of uncle and nephew, aunt and niece, provided the burial did not take place before the day on which the witness or informant was required to attend. In every other case, a juror, witness or informant who has been condemned to a fine by

reason of his absence may obtain the remission of the penalty by accounting for his absence to the satisfaction of the Court." 4. Miss Miller of course has not yet been subjected to any penalty. Article 65 goes on to provide:- "Nevertheless, if the ground for absence arises on the day before that on which the person is required to attend, or on the day itself, and the juror, witness or informant who is prevented from appearing has been unable to fulfil the requirements of this law, he or she may obtain the remission of the penalties incurred by him, without costs, by accounting for his or her inability to attend to the satisfaction of the Court." 5. Trial by jury lies at the heart of our criminal justice system and is dependent upon members of the public carrying out the duty of a juror when required to do so. When a member of the public is summoned to attend they must do so unless there is a legitimate excuse. In my experience the Viscount's officer is always very reasonable and understanding in considering written applications for exemption under Article 32(A) of the 1964 Law but an application must be made in writing to the Viscount for such exemption.

6. Miss Miller has apologised and explained to me that her partner arranged a surprise holiday to Turkey on 16 th September and her summons for jury service simply slipped her mind. It is clear to me that she is distressed at being arrested and brought before the Court to account for her non-appearance and she has been very open for her reason for not attending, but it is not of course a justification for her failure to attend. It is appropriate in my view that a penalty should be imposed.

7. She will therefore pay a fine of £100 and has 7 days in which to pay. Authorities Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle . Page Last Updated: 06 Jun 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Loi (1864) Reglant La Procedure Criminelle

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.