Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Mohammed [2008] JRC 189 (07 November 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A custodial sentence is warranted for drug offences committed while on probation, but the sentence may be suspended to allow the defendant an opportunity for rehabilitation through education.

Court disposition

custodial sentence imposed and suspended for 12 months

Orders

  • Sentences of imprisonment as moved for by the Crown Advocate, suspended for 12 months
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs

02

Material facts

Parties

Mohammed

Defendant Counsel: defence counsel

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor Counsel: Crown Advocate

Amounts and remedies

  • Suspension Period: 12

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Defence counsel submitted that the defendant should be allowed to continue his course at Highlands College as part of his rehabilitation.
Respondent
Crown Advocate moved for sentences of imprisonment due to the seriousness of the offences and the defendant's breach of probation.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences)(Jersey) Law 2003

    The Court may suspend a custodial sentence under the Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences)(Jersey) Law 2003 if it considers it appropriate.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A custodial sentence is warranted for drug offences committed while on probation, but the sentence may be suspended to allow the defendant an opportunity for rehabilitation through education.

Obiter and limits

  • Only the defendant can decide to turn his life around; the Court can only impose penalties.
  • The Court cannot make completion of the educational course a condition of the order but trusts the defendant to do so.

Court disposition

custodial sentence imposed and suspended for 12 months

  • Sentences of imprisonment as moved for by the Crown Advocate, suspended for 12 months
  • Forfeiture and destruction of the drugs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2008] JRC 189

JUDGMENT the bailiff: 1. Mohammed, you are an intelligent young man who has so far made a complete mess of his life as a result of engaging in drugs. You know that, we know that, everyone in this Court knows that. You went into these recent offences with your eyes open and we have no doubt that you deserve to be sent to prison for quite blatantly committing an offence when you were on probation.

2. We have given very anxious consideration to all the remedies available to us. We are not going to make a Community Service Order and we are not going to make a Probation Order. The only thing that has caused us difficulty and given us pause for thought before imposing another custodial sentence on you, is the paragraph in the Probation Officer's Report and your own counsel's submissions about your course at Highlands. We think that you are quite right to pursue this educational opportunity because, if you are going to turn your life around, it will require the obtaining of some qualifications as well as the willpower within yourself to give up bad company and to give up drugs. Only you can do that, the Court can impose penalties but only you can decide whether or not you want to turn your life around and do something about it. You are very lucky that you still have the support of your parents and you have let them down on more occasions probably than you would wish to remember.

3. We are going to impose a custodial sentence but we are going to exercise our power under the Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences)(Jersey) Law 2003 to suspend that sentence for a period of 12 months. Now what that means is that if, during that time, you do not commit an offence which is punishable with imprisonment then you will not go to prison. If you do commit an offence which is punishable with imprisonment, then you will come back to this Court and it is very likely that the prison sentence which we are going to impose now will be activated and you will go into custody. We are doing that for one reason only and that reason is that you should continue your course at Highlands College and complete it. We cannot make that a condition of the order we are going to make now so we are trusting you and if you breach that trust then you must expect that in future the Courts will not be as sympathetic towards you.

4. The Court is going to grant the conclusions in the sense that we are going to impose sentences of imprisonment as moved for by the Crown Advocate but we will suspend those sentences for a period of 12 months and we hope very much that you will take advantage of this chance and complete your course at Highlands College and make something of your life.

5. We order the forfeiture and destruction of the drugs. Authorities Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences)(Jersey) Law 2003. AG v Mohammed [2004] JRC 027 . AG v Lopes [2001] JRC 63 . AG v Fenn and others [2003] JRC 105 . AG v Tanguy and Stewart [2008] JRC 094 . Page Last Updated: 22 Jul 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG v Mohammed [2004] JRC 027

Case cited

AG v Lopes [2001] JRC 63

Case cited

AG v Fenn and others [2003] JRC 105

Case cited

AG v Tanguy and Stewart [2008] JRC 094

Case cited

Criminal Justice (Suspension of Prison Sentences)(Jersey) Law 2003

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.