AG v Murphy [2005] JRC 080 (10 June 2005)
- Citation
- [2005] JRC 080
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The seriousness of the affray and assault, combined with lack of remorse and limited victim empathy, warrants a custodial sentence under Article 4(2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994.
Court disposition
Convicted and sentenced to youth custody.
Orders
- 3 months youth custody on Count 1
- 6 months youth custody on Count 2, consecutive
- Exclusion order from licensed premises (except Category 6) for 6 months from release
- Possible supervision after release
02
Material facts
Parties
Unknown (Defendant)
DefendantAttorney General
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Sentence Already Served: 17.29
- Total Sentence Imposed: 9
- Exclusion Order Duration: 6
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Appropriate sentence for affray and assault by a young offender
- 02
Justification for custodial sentence under Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994
- 03
Application of exclusion order to licensed premises
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Defendant pleaded guilty at an early stage, has youth on his side, and has already served 4 months in youth custody.
- Respondent
- Offences were grave, involved alcohol, were unprovoked, and defendant showed limited victim empathy and no remorse.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994, Article 4(2)
Custodial sentence justified where offence is so serious that non-custodial sentence cannot be justified.
- 02
Thomas: Principles of Sentencing, pp 110-112
Sentencing for affray considers level of violence, scale, and premeditation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The seriousness of the affray and assault, combined with lack of remorse and limited victim empathy, warrants a custodial sentence under Article 4(2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994.
Obiter and limits
- Alcohol played a part in both offences.
- Exclusion order applies to all licensed premises except Category 6 off-licenses for 6 months from release.
- Defendant may be subject to supervision after release from youth custody.
Court disposition
Convicted and sentenced to youth custody.
- 3 months youth custody on Count 1
- 6 months youth custody on Count 2, consecutive
- Exclusion order from licensed premises (except Category 6) for 6 months from release
- Possible supervision after release
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE COMMISSIONER: 1. We turn immediately to the offence of affray which as we have said before in A. G. -v- Shewan [1999]JRC22 is by its very nature a particularly grave matter. Coupled with that, of course, is the assault just before Christmas of last year in Conway Street which was apparently unprovoked. In both those cases alcohol played a part.
2. Of course the offence of affray covers a very wide variety of situations and in his work Principles of Sentencing Professor Thomas talks of the level of violence used, the scale of the affray and the extent to which it was premeditated or spontaneous.
3. Now in both these cases, the assault and the affray, your behaviour was cowardly and unpleasant. The alarming thing about the detailed reports that we have read is the passage which says that you show alarming, limited victim empathy and no remorse. You have youth on your side and you have pleaded guilty at an early stage. We note that you have already served 4 months in youth custody.
4. However, I am bound to explain to you that under Article 4 (2) of the Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994 the offence, or the totality of the offending is so serious that a non-custodial sentence cannot be justified. The question that we have had to face is how long you should serve for these very serious offences.
5. We are going to sentence you to 3 months on Count 1, and 6 months on Count 2, consecutive; that is 9 months in total, and you have already served 17 weeks and 2 days which is approximately equivalent to 6 months. I hope you use the remaining opportunity to try to turn your life around, but I have to tell you that there will be an exclusion order and this is in addition to your sentence. It does not apply to Category 6 licenses, which are off-licenses, but it applies to all other Categories of licensed premises and that will come into effect for 6 months from the date of your release. I have to tell you that you may be subject to a period of supervision once you have come out youth custody. Authorities A. G. -v- Shewan [1999]JRC22. Thomas: Principles of Sentencing, pp 110-112. Criminal Justice (Young Offenders) (Jersey) Law 1994 Page Last Updated: 18 Aug 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.