Jersey Judgment

AG v O'Brien [2004] JRC 055 (19 March 2004)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant's offences were serious, involved aggravating features, and he had a long record of previous convictions; despite some mitigating factors, a custodial sentence totaling three years was warranted.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 1A
  • 6 months' imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 4, consecutive
  • total of 3 years' imprisonment

02

Material facts

Parties

The Defendant

Defendant Counsel: defence counsel

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment on Count 1 a: months 18
  • Imprisonment on Count 3: months 6
  • Imprisonment on Count 4: months 18
  • Total Imprisonment: months 36

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Defence counsel emphasized the defendant's efforts to obtain employment in prison, support from his father, and urged the court to consider these mitigating factors.
Respondent
Prosecution relied on the seriousness of the offences, the defendant's long record of previous convictions, and the aggravating feature of occupied premises during the illegal entry.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (2nd Ed'n, updated to November, 2003): pp.141-147

    Sentencing must reflect the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, and the defendant's criminal record.

  2. 02

    A. G. -v- Gaffney [1995] JLR N.22

    Sentences for multiple offences may be ordered to run concurrently or consecutively depending on the circumstances.

  3. 03

    A. G. -v- Da Silva (4th December, 1997) Jersey Unreported; [1997/218]

    Aggravating features such as occupied premises increase the seriousness of the offence.

  4. 04

    A. G. -v- Moreira [2003]JRC083A

    Previous convictions are a relevant factor in sentencing.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant's offences were serious, involved aggravating features, and he had a long record of previous convictions; despite some mitigating factors, a custodial sentence totaling three years was warranted.

Obiter and limits

  • The court is encouraged by the defendant's efforts to obtain employment in prison and support from his father.
  • It is hoped the defendant has begun to lay the foundations for a more worthwhile life.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 1A
  • 6 months' imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 4, consecutive
  • total of 3 years' imprisonment

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2004] JRC 055

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. This defendant is to be sentenced on three counts, namely one count of aiding and abetting a break in at Millers Bar Bistro, one count of illegal entry with intent to commit a crime at the Dolphin Hotel and one count of larceny.

2. The first of those charges involved considerable damage to the premises and an attempt to remove a safe which was eventually abandoned on the pavement. Those were commercial premises.

3. The second of those charges, the illegal entry of the Dolphin Hotel did, however, involve the aggravating feature that it was highly likely that the premises were occupied. Indeed they were occupied, and it must have been a very frightening experience for the occupiers to be awoken by young men behaving in the way that this accused and his accomplice did.

4. The defendant has a long record of previous convictions. The Court has listened very carefully to the submissions of counsel who has said everything that could be said on the defendant's behalf. It is very encouraging both that the defendant now has, it appears, the support of his father and that he has himself made considerable efforts to obtain employment in the prison.

5. We hope that he has begun to lay the foundations for a more worthwhile and satisfying life than he has led so far. We take into account all the matters laid before us by defence counsel and in the reports which we have read. We think, however, that the conclusions are correct and that in the meantime the defendant must be punished for the offences that he has admitted.

6. The conclusions are therefore granted and on count 1A you are sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment; on count 3 to 6 months' imprisonment, concurrent; on count 4 to 18 months' imprisonment, consecutive, making a total of 3 years' imprisonment. Authorities Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (2 nd Ed'n, updated to November, 2003): pp.141-147. A. G. -v- Gaffney [1995] JLR N.22. A. G. -v- Da Silva (4 th December, 1997) Jersey Unreported; [1997/218]. A. G. -v- Moreira [2003]JRC083A. Page Last Updated: 29 Jun 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

A. G. -v- Gaffney [1995] JLR N.22

Case cited

A. G. -v- Da Silva (4th December, 1997) Jersey Unreported; [1997/218]

Case cited

A. G. -v- Moreira [2003]JRC083A

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.