AG v O'Brien [2004] JRC 055 (19 March 2004)
- Citation
- [2004] JRC 055
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant's offences were serious, involved aggravating features, and he had a long record of previous convictions; despite some mitigating factors, a custodial sentence totaling three years was warranted.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 1A
- 6 months' imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 4, consecutive
- total of 3 years' imprisonment
02
Material facts
Parties
The Defendant
Defendant Counsel: defence counselAttorney General
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment on Count 1 a: months 18
- Imprisonment on Count 3: months 6
- Imprisonment on Count 4: months 18
- Total Imprisonment: months 36
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
appropriate sentence for aiding and abetting break-in
- 02
appropriate sentence for illegal entry with intent to commit a crime
- 03
appropriate sentence for larceny
- 04
consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Defence counsel emphasized the defendant's efforts to obtain employment in prison, support from his father, and urged the court to consider these mitigating factors.
- Respondent
- Prosecution relied on the seriousness of the offences, the defendant's long record of previous convictions, and the aggravating feature of occupied premises during the illegal entry.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (2nd Ed'n, updated to November, 2003): pp.141-147
Sentencing must reflect the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating factors, and the defendant's criminal record.
- 02
A. G. -v- Gaffney [1995] JLR N.22
Sentences for multiple offences may be ordered to run concurrently or consecutively depending on the circumstances.
- 03
A. G. -v- Da Silva (4th December, 1997) Jersey Unreported; [1997/218]
Aggravating features such as occupied premises increase the seriousness of the offence.
- 04
A. G. -v- Moreira [2003]JRC083A
Previous convictions are a relevant factor in sentencing.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant's offences were serious, involved aggravating features, and he had a long record of previous convictions; despite some mitigating factors, a custodial sentence totaling three years was warranted.
Obiter and limits
- The court is encouraged by the defendant's efforts to obtain employment in prison and support from his father.
- It is hoped the defendant has begun to lay the foundations for a more worthwhile life.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 1A
- 6 months' imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 4, consecutive
- total of 3 years' imprisonment
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. This defendant is to be sentenced on three counts, namely one count of aiding and abetting a break in at Millers Bar Bistro, one count of illegal entry with intent to commit a crime at the Dolphin Hotel and one count of larceny.
2. The first of those charges involved considerable damage to the premises and an attempt to remove a safe which was eventually abandoned on the pavement. Those were commercial premises.
3. The second of those charges, the illegal entry of the Dolphin Hotel did, however, involve the aggravating feature that it was highly likely that the premises were occupied. Indeed they were occupied, and it must have been a very frightening experience for the occupiers to be awoken by young men behaving in the way that this accused and his accomplice did.
4. The defendant has a long record of previous convictions. The Court has listened very carefully to the submissions of counsel who has said everything that could be said on the defendant's behalf. It is very encouraging both that the defendant now has, it appears, the support of his father and that he has himself made considerable efforts to obtain employment in the prison.
5. We hope that he has begun to lay the foundations for a more worthwhile and satisfying life than he has led so far. We take into account all the matters laid before us by defence counsel and in the reports which we have read. We think, however, that the conclusions are correct and that in the meantime the defendant must be punished for the offences that he has admitted.
6. The conclusions are therefore granted and on count 1A you are sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment; on count 3 to 6 months' imprisonment, concurrent; on count 4 to 18 months' imprisonment, consecutive, making a total of 3 years' imprisonment. Authorities Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey (2 nd Ed'n, updated to November, 2003): pp.141-147. A. G. -v- Gaffney [1995] JLR N.22. A. G. -v- Da Silva (4 th December, 1997) Jersey Unreported; [1997/218]. A. G. -v- Moreira [2003]JRC083A. Page Last Updated: 29 Jun 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.