Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Povey [2010] JRC 127A (09 July 2010)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The defendant breached the Community Service Order, which is a serious alternative to imprisonment, and the breach must be marked by a fine and continuation of the order.

Court disposition

breach marked by fine and continuation of community service order

Orders

  • Fine of £200 or 2 weeks' imprisonment, payable within 2 weeks
  • Defendant to perform the remaining 33 hours of community service within the timetable set by community service managers

02

Material facts

Parties

Mr Povey

Defendant Counsel: Advocate Fogarty

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine for Breach of Community Service Order: GBP 200
  • Balance of Community Service Hours to Serve: 33

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Breach of Community Service Order Hearing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Probation Service report sets out the various breaches of the Community Service Order by Mr Povey.
Respondent
Mr Povey agreed he was in breach and stated he was willing and able to perform community service.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001, Article 2

    Community Service Orders are alternatives to imprisonment only in cases serious enough to justify imprisonment, and must be strictly complied with.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The defendant breached the Community Service Order, which is a serious alternative to imprisonment, and the breach must be marked by a fine and continuation of the order.

Obiter and limits

  • Community service is not a soft option and the court will not tolerate its orders being ignored.
  • Further breach will likely result in a custodial sentence without credit for community service already performed.

Court disposition

breach marked by fine and continuation of community service order

  • Fine of £200 or 2 weeks' imprisonment, payable within 2 weeks
  • Defendant to perform the remaining 33 hours of community service within the timetable set by community service managers

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2010] JRC 127A

JUDGMENT THE DEPUTY BAILIFF: 1. Mr Povey, you are before us today for breach of a Community Service Order which the Court imposed on 2 nd December, 2009, when you pleaded guilty to 1 charge of assault for which you were sentenced to perform 70 hours of community service.

2. May I remind you that what the Court said on that occasion was that:- "The Court treats violence at night on the streets of St Helier very seriously". There is no doubt at all that the appropriate sentence for you in relation to that offence would have been 2 months' imprisonment but as an alternative the Court was prepared to impose a Community Service Order and I have a note from the hearing on that occasion that your counsel Advocate Fogarty told the Court that you suffered from a trapped nerve and that you would be willing to do community service and able to do it.

3. You have agreed this morning that you are in breach of the Community Service Order and you have seen a copy of the report from the Probation Service which sets out the various breaches of that order.

4. Article 2 of the Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001 says that the Court has power to make a Community Service Order only where it was considering passing a sentence of imprisonment in your case. The Community Service Order is to be performed according to the Law in this way:- The Obligations of the offender , that is you, are to:- "(a) keep in touch with the relevant officer in accordance with such instructions as the offender may from time to time be given by that officer and notify the officer of any change of address; and (b) perform, to the satisfaction of the relevant officer and for the number of hours specified in the order, such work at such times as the offender may be instructed by the relevant officer." The managers of the community service programme have the obligation under the Law to ensure that the community service work is performed when the Court so orders it and you have an obligation to comply with what you are told to do by the community service manager.

5. It is sometimes said that the performance of community service is some sort of soft option; indeed some offenders may themselves take that view because they are entitled to retain their liberty while the Community Service Order is being performed. But the extracts which I have read to you from the Law make it plain that it is an alternative to imprisonment only in cases which are serious enough which would otherwise justify sending someone to prison, and the Court is not going to stand by and permit its orders in relation to community service to be ignored, to be disregarded and generally to be taken lightly. Community Service is absolutely not a soft option.

6. The Court is satisfied that there has been a breach of community service on this occasion and we have been pondering on what is the best way of dealing with it now. We are going to mark that breach by fining you the sum of £200 or 2 weeks' imprisonment and you have 2 weeks to pay that fine. £200 is the fine for the breach of the Community Service Order which has been imposed so far.

7. We have then gone on to consider what we are going to do with the Community Service Order itself and we have decided that you will perform the balance of the Community Service Order within the timetable which is set down by the community service managers. So you will do whatever you are required to do for the purposes of performing that Order which the Court imposed last year. The balance of 33 hours left to serve and as far as the Court is concerned, we have noted that you had absolutely no difficulty in walking from the back of the Court to the dock and no difficulty in walking from the dock to the place in front of us and indeed, you say yourself, that you are willing to do the work and you feel fit so you should do the full programme which you are required to do by community service.

8. I want to give you this warning. If there is a next time, if there is a further breach then almost certainly you will be remanded in custody while counsel is found for you because this Court takes the view that although what the Court does on the next occasion, if you do not perform this, will be a matter for that Court, we think a custodial sentence is inevitable and what is more, as far as we are concerned we think that it is unlikely that that Court will give any credit for the community service which you have performed so far. So the result of that would be that you will be sentenced to a sentence of imprisonment which is in addition to the community service which you have performed. I say that because I want to make it quite plain that the Court's orders about community service are to be performed. Authorities AG-v-Evans and Povey [2009] JRC232. Page Last Updated: 02 Aug 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG-v-Evans and Povey [2009] JRC232

Case cited

Criminal Justice (Community Service Orders)(Jersey) Law 2001

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.