Jersey Judgment

AG v Powell [2000] JRC 107 (16 June 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Threatening a police officer with a knife is a grave offence aggravated by intoxication, justifying a custodial sentence and an exclusion order to prevent recurrence.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 1
  • 12 months' imprisonment on count 2, concurrent
  • 1 week's imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
  • Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for 3 months from release
  • Forfeiture of the knife

02

Material facts

Parties

Powell

Defendant Counsel: defence counsel

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor Counsel: Crown Advocate

Amounts and remedies

  • Imprisonment Count 1 (months): 18
  • Imprisonment Count 2 (months): 12
  • Imprisonment Count 3 (weeks): 1
  • Exclusion Order (months): 3

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Defence counsel submitted that a concurrent sentence should be imposed for the offence in the Royal Square.
Respondent
Crown Advocate argued for severe punishment due to the seriousness of threatening a police officer with a knife and that intoxication is an aggravating factor.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judgment

    Threatening a police officer with a weapon is a serious offence requiring severe punishment.

  2. 02

    Judgment

    Intoxication is not a defence and is an aggravating factor in sentencing.

  3. 03

    Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998

    Exclusion orders can be imposed under the Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998 to assist in rehabilitation.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Threatening a police officer with a knife is a grave offence aggravated by intoxication, justifying a custodial sentence and an exclusion order to prevent recurrence.

Obiter and limits

  • The defendant must control drinking to avoid further offences.
  • The exclusion order is intended to help the defendant rehabilitate.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced

  • 18 months' imprisonment on count 1
  • 12 months' imprisonment on count 2, concurrent
  • 1 week's imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
  • Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for 3 months from release
  • Forfeiture of the knife

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JRC 107

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. To threaten to strike a police officer with a knife is a very serious offence and must be severely punished. The fact that Powell was drunk is no defence and no excuse and is indeed an aggravating factor in that his intoxication made him, on that occasion, a much more dangerous person. We think that the conclusions of the Crown Advocate on counts 1 and 2 are entirely correct.

2. So far as the offence in the Royal Square is concerned, we accept the submissions of defence counsel and we will impose a concurrent sentence.

3. Powell, we have no doubt that you must control your drinking if you are to get your life in order and if you are not to be at risk of committing even more serious offences. We are going to try to help you in that respect by imposing an order under the Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998 , which will prohibit you from entering any licensed premises for a period of 3 months to begin on the date on which you are released from prison. We hope that you will take advantage of that prohibition to conduct your life differently once you are again at liberty.

4. On count 1, you are sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment; on count 2, you are sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent; on count 3, you are sentenced to 1 week's imprisonment, concurrent, making a total of 18 months' imprisonment. We impose an Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for a period of 3 months to begin on the date on which you are released from prison. We further order the forfeiture of the knife. Authorities Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey: pp.90-91; 94-95. Ibid: 1995-1996 Noter Up: p.34. Ibid: 1996-1997 Noter Up: pp.45-46. AG -v- Gibaut (31 st May, 1985) Jersey Unreported. AG -v- Whiteford (2 nd July, 1993) Jersey Unreported. AG -v- Ashford (12 th July, 1996) Jersey Unreported. Page Last Updated: 19 Aug 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

AG v Gibaut (31 May 1985) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

AG v Whiteford (2 July 1993) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

AG v Ashford (12 July 1996) Jersey Unreported

Case cited

Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.