AG v Powell [2000] JRC 107 (16 June 2000)
- Citation
- [2000] JRC 107
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Threatening a police officer with a knife is a grave offence aggravated by intoxication, justifying a custodial sentence and an exclusion order to prevent recurrence.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 1
- 12 months' imprisonment on count 2, concurrent
- 1 week's imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
- Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for 3 months from release
- Forfeiture of the knife
02
Material facts
Parties
Powell
Defendant Counsel: defence counselCrown Advocate
Prosecutor Counsel: Crown AdvocateAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment Count 1 (months): 18
- Imprisonment Count 2 (months): 12
- Imprisonment Count 3 (weeks): 1
- Exclusion Order (months): 3
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether threatening a police officer with a knife warrants severe punishment
- 02
Whether intoxication is a defence or aggravating factor
- 03
Appropriateness of concurrent sentences for related offences
- 04
Imposition of exclusion order under the Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Defence counsel submitted that a concurrent sentence should be imposed for the offence in the Royal Square.
- Respondent
- Crown Advocate argued for severe punishment due to the seriousness of threatening a police officer with a knife and that intoxication is an aggravating factor.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Judgment
Threatening a police officer with a weapon is a serious offence requiring severe punishment.
- 02
Judgment
Intoxication is not a defence and is an aggravating factor in sentencing.
- 03
Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998
Exclusion orders can be imposed under the Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998 to assist in rehabilitation.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Threatening a police officer with a knife is a grave offence aggravated by intoxication, justifying a custodial sentence and an exclusion order to prevent recurrence.
Obiter and limits
- The defendant must control drinking to avoid further offences.
- The exclusion order is intended to help the defendant rehabilitate.
Court disposition
convicted and sentenced
- 18 months' imprisonment on count 1
- 12 months' imprisonment on count 2, concurrent
- 1 week's imprisonment on count 3, concurrent
- Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for 3 months from release
- Forfeiture of the knife
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. To threaten to strike a police officer with a knife is a very serious offence and must be severely punished. The fact that Powell was drunk is no defence and no excuse and is indeed an aggravating factor in that his intoxication made him, on that occasion, a much more dangerous person. We think that the conclusions of the Crown Advocate on counts 1 and 2 are entirely correct.
2. So far as the offence in the Royal Square is concerned, we accept the submissions of defence counsel and we will impose a concurrent sentence.
3. Powell, we have no doubt that you must control your drinking if you are to get your life in order and if you are not to be at risk of committing even more serious offences. We are going to try to help you in that respect by imposing an order under the Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons) (Jersey) Law, 1998 , which will prohibit you from entering any licensed premises for a period of 3 months to begin on the date on which you are released from prison. We hope that you will take advantage of that prohibition to conduct your life differently once you are again at liberty.
4. On count 1, you are sentenced to 18 months' imprisonment; on count 2, you are sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment, concurrent; on count 3, you are sentenced to 1 week's imprisonment, concurrent, making a total of 18 months' imprisonment. We impose an Exclusion Order under the 1998 Law for a period of 3 months to begin on the date on which you are released from prison. We further order the forfeiture of the knife. Authorities Whelan: Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Courts of Jersey: pp.90-91; 94-95. Ibid: 1995-1996 Noter Up: p.34. Ibid: 1996-1997 Noter Up: pp.45-46. AG -v- Gibaut (31 st May, 1985) Jersey Unreported. AG -v- Whiteford (2 nd July, 1993) Jersey Unreported. AG -v- Ashford (12 th July, 1996) Jersey Unreported. Page Last Updated: 19 Aug 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.