Jersey Judgment

AG -v- Power [2016] JRC 229 (09 December 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Given the defendant's serious record, nature of the offences, and background, a custodial sentence is necessary, but the sentence is reduced in light of the defendant's letter and progress on remand.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced to imprisonment

Orders

  • 14 months' imprisonment (aggregate of concurrent and consecutive terms)
  • forfeiture and destruction of drugs

02

Material facts

Parties

Unknown Defendant

Defendant

Crown

Prosecution

Amounts and remedies

  • Total Imprisonment Term: months 14

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Sentencing

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defendant submitted a letter expressing remorse, a desire to be a proper father, and referenced progress made while on remand. The advocate argued for a reduced sentence.
Respondent
The Crown sought a custodial sentence of 16 months due to the defendant's record and the seriousness of the offences.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines

    Sentencing must reflect the seriousness of the offence, the defendant's record, and prospects for rehabilitation.

  2. 02

    Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111

    Preventative sentences may be imposed for persistent reoffending.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Given the defendant's serious record, nature of the offences, and background, a custodial sentence is necessary, but the sentence is reduced in light of the defendant's letter and progress on remand.

Obiter and limits

  • The defendant is urged to continue rehabilitation efforts and take advantage of prison and probation services.
  • Future reoffending may result in a preventative sentence.

Court disposition

convicted and sentenced to imprisonment

  • 14 months' imprisonment (aggregate of concurrent and consecutive terms)
  • forfeiture and destruction of drugs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2016] JRC 229

JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. You have a terrible record and you were released from your last prison sentence in November 2015. Now you are back before the Court for the current offences, that is two counts of possession of drugs, Class B and Class C, an assault which involved putting your arm around the neck of the victim, who you suspected of taking your money at the shelter and squeezing hard, one count of shop lifting and one count of illegal entry and larceny of a bike from an underground carpark.

2. We have read your letter. It is clear that it is your drug habit which is at the root of your problems. And indeed, that is what happened this time. All appeared to be going well but your drug habit caused you to lose first your job and then your accommodation, and it was a downward path after that. Your letter speaks of your desire to be a proper father to your son. Well, the only person who can address that is you and that requires you to conquer your drug habit. Now we have read that letter carefully and it is an impressive letter. We hope you mean what you say in it. We have paid careful attention to it and of course to what your advocate has said but the offending in this case, your previous record and the background report means we cannot proceed by way of a non-custodial sentence. However, we do agree with your advocate that the conclusions can be reduced a little.

3. We note the progress that you have made whilst on remand and we urge you to continue with that progress. Services are available at the prison and you can take advantage of what is on offer. Furthermore, I am sure the Probation Service will help you when you are released so that you do not come out cold so to speak, but preparations can be made with a view to trying to avoid your falling back into reoffending; because you must remember that last time the Court warned you that it might have to impose a preventative sentence, that means a longer sentence than normal, if you did not stop reoffending. Well we are not doing so on this occasion, but if you continue reoffending when you come out, there is a real risk that some court might in the future feel it has to do that.

4. So we are going to impose a prison sentence as follows. On Count 1; 2 weeks' imprisonment, on Count 2; 6 months' imprisonment, on Count 3; 2 weeks' imprisonment, all of those concurrent. On Count 4; 8 months' imprisonment, consecutive, on Count 5; 1 month's imprisonment, concurrent. So that makes a total of 14 months' imprisonment rather than the 16 months' imprisonment asked for by the Crown.

5. We order the forfeiture and destruction of the drugs. Authorities Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111 AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JRC 101 . AG-v-Power & Oliver [2014] JRC 009. Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines. Page Last Updated: 23 Jan 2017 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111

Case cited

AG-v-Gaffney [1995] JRC 101

Case cited

AG-v-Power & Oliver [2014] JRC 009

Case cited

Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.