Jersey Judgment

AG v Prior [2000] JRC 227 (17 November 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Bail refused due to the applicant constituting a significant risk to the public and likelihood of further offences if released, as supported by psychiatric reports.

Court disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Bail application refused; applicant to remain in custody.

02

Material facts

Parties

Jason Cyril Prior

Applicant

Amounts and remedies

  • Duration in Custody: 135

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bail Application / Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with grave and criminal assault who has been in custody for an extended period

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant has been in custody since 7th April 1999 and trial is unlikely to occur until next year, making the remand period unusually long.
Respondent
Applicant poses a significant risk to the public if released, as indicated by Consultant Psychiatrists' reports.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Archbold (2000 Ed'n): paras: 16-52 & 53; 16-57 to 16-59; 16-73

    Bail may be refused where the accused poses a significant risk to the public and there is a risk of further offences being committed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Bail refused due to the applicant constituting a significant risk to the public and likelihood of further offences if released, as supported by psychiatric reports.

Obiter and limits

  • It is unusual for an accused person to be held on remand in custody for such a long period.

Court disposition

application refused

  • Bail application refused; applicant to remain in custody.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JRC 227

JUDGMENT THE BAILIFF: 1. This is an application for bail by Jason Cyril Prior who has been charged with grave and criminal assault. Counsel has reminded us that the applicant has been in custody since 7 th April, 1999, and that it is likely that his trial will not take place - on the assumption that he maintains his plea of not guilty to the charge - until the beginning of next year. It is therefore unusual for an accused person to be held on remand in custody for such a long period.

2. The Court has, however, had the opportunity of studying carefully the papers which have been placed before us and it is satisfied that the circumstances of this case are sufficiently unusual to justify the continuation of the remand in custody. In particular we have had close regard to the reports prepared by the Consultant Psychiatrists and we are satisfied as at present advised that if the applicant were released he would constitute a significant risk to the public and that there would therefore be a risk of further offences being committed.

3. On that basis the Court refuses the application for bail. Authorities Archbold (2000 Ed'n): paras: 16-52 & 53; 16-57 to 16-59; 16-73. Page Last Updated: 19 Aug 2015 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Archbold (2000 Ed'n): paras: 16-52 & 53; 16-57 to 16-59; 16-73

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.