AG -v- Silva [2015] JRC 153 (06 July 2015)
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 153
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The defendant committed an unprovoked violent assault involving kicking to the head, with no exceptional circumstances to avoid imprisonment; deportation is recommended as continued presence is detrimental to public good and family ties to Jersey are minimal.
Court disposition
convicted
Orders
- 18 months' imprisonment
- recommendation for deportation at end of sentence
02
Material facts
Parties
Defendant
Defendant Counsel: Advocate FogartyCrown
ProsecutorAmounts and remedies
- Sentence Length Months: 18
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendant should be sentenced to imprisonment for assault
- 02
Whether deportation should be recommended
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Advocate Fogarty argued for no prison sentence, citing early guilty plea, long-ago prior conviction, good work record, and strong employer references.
- Respondent
- The Crown argued that violent assaults in St Helier warrant imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances exist, and that kicking to the head is particularly serious.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court policy
Violent assaults on the streets of St Helier result in imprisonment unless exceptional circumstances exist.
- 02
Legal test for deportation
Deportation may be recommended if continued presence is detrimental to public good, subject to Article 8 of the Convention.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The defendant committed an unprovoked violent assault involving kicking to the head, with no exceptional circumstances to avoid imprisonment; deportation is recommended as continued presence is detrimental to public good and family ties to Jersey are minimal.
Obiter and limits
- The defendant is well regarded by employers and friends, but has put his reputation at risk by this assault.
- The victim made no complaint and was not interviewed, but the incident was witnessed by police and captured on CCTV.
Court disposition
convicted
- 18 months' imprisonment
- recommendation for deportation at end of sentence
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
JUDGMENT THE commissioner: 1. You assaulted the victim in this case at 2:30 in the morning in St Helier by punching him twice to the head, causing him to fall to the ground, and you then kicked him once to the head, causing his head to come forward as we have heard. Although you say he must have provoked you, there is no evidence to support that and you cannot recall. It is true to say the victim has made no complaint; he left the scene and was not interviewed. There is therefore no evidence of any injuries; nevertheless the incident was witnessed by the police and captured on CCTV.
2. Advocate Fogarty has urged us to consider not sending you to prison. She has pointed out that you pleaded guilty at an early stage, which is to your credit; she has explained how your previous conviction in Madeira was a long time ago when you were very young; she has pointed also to your very good work record in Jersey, and that is supported by the many references we have received from your employers and by the fact that they have taken the trouble to come to Court to support you. So it is clear that you are well regarded.
3. That makes it all the more sad that you have put all of that at risk by this unprovoked assault because the Court's policy is very clear. Those who commit violent assaults on the streets of St Helier will be sent to prison unless there are exceptional circumstances. We have listened very carefully to everything your advocate has said and to what your employers and friends have said in their references but we cannot find that there are exceptional circumstances in this case. Furthermore, for an assault which involves kicking to the head, which can so easily cause life-threatening injuries, we think that the Crown's conclusions are correct.
4. As to deportation, we are quite satisfied that the first limb of the test is met and because of this assault, your continued presence in the Island would be detrimental to the public good. We have considered against that your right under Article 8 of the Convention to your family life. You were brought up in Madeira; you have spent three periods in Jersey, a few months in 1999, 2 years from 2009 to 2011 and then the period since January 2015 to now. But your parents are in Madeira and your daughter is also in Madeira. Your wife lives in Brazil and you have no family in Jersey. In all the circumstances we see no reason not to recommend deportation.
5. The sentence of the Court is of 18 months' imprisonment. We also make a recommendation for deportation at the end of your sentence. Authorities Harrison-v-AG [2004] JLR 111 . Whelan on Aspects of Sentencing in the Superior Court of Jersey. AG-v-Anderson [2013] JRC 230 . AG-v- Huet [2014] JRC 130A . AG-v- Mildren [2014] JRC 141 . Licensed Premises (Exclusion of Certain Persons)(Jersey) Law 1998. AG v Passman and Passman [2007] JRC 230. Camacho v AG [2007] JLR 462 . Page Last Updated: 27 Sep 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.